RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC 22709-2194, USA.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;26(2):173-81. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1112-5. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
Panitumumab monotherapy is approved for chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patient-reported outcomes-although important in the palliative setting-have not been reported in this patient population.
In a phase 3 trial (n = 463), patients with chemotherapy-refractory mCRC were randomized 1:1 to panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the NCCN/FACT CRC Symptom Index (FCSI) and EQ-5D Index. KRAS tumor status was analyzed in a prospectively defined, retrospective analysis. Average difference in change from baseline between treatment groups was evaluated using linear mixed and pattern-mixture models.
KRAS tumor status and post-baseline patient-reported outcomes were available for 363 patients. Linear mixed models indicated significant differences in the FCSI score (difference in least-squares [LS] adjusted means [95% CI]; 5.62 [2.38, 8.86]) and the EQ-5D Index (difference in LS adjusted means [95% CI]; 0.22 [0.12, 0.32]) favoring panitumumab over BSC in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. By pattern-mixture analysis, the advantage of panitumumab over BSC was more pronounced in those patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC who did not drop out of the study early. In patients with mutant KRAS mCRC, no differences were observed between groups.
Panitumumab-treated patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC maintained better control of CRC symptoms and quality of life compared with BSC alone, extending our understanding of the benefits of panitumumab treatment beyond improvements in progression-free survival.
帕尼单抗单药治疗适用于化疗耐药野生型 KRAS 转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)。虽然患者报告的结局在姑息治疗中很重要,但在该患者人群中尚未报告。
在一项 3 期试验(n=463)中,化疗耐药 mCRC 患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配至帕尼单抗联合最佳支持治疗(BSC)或 BSC 单药治疗。采用 NCCN/FACT CRC 症状指数(FCSI)和 EQ-5D 指数评估患者报告的结局。前瞻性定义、回顾性分析 KRAS 肿瘤状态。使用线性混合和模式混合模型评估治疗组间从基线变化的平均差异。
363 例患者可评估 KRAS 肿瘤状态和基线后患者报告的结局。线性混合模型表明,在 FCSI 评分(最小二乘[LS]调整均值的差异[95%CI];5.62[2.38,8.86])和 EQ-5D 指数(LS 调整均值的差异[95%CI];0.22[0.12,0.32])方面,与 BSC 相比,野生型 KRAS mCRC 患者接受帕尼单抗治疗具有显著差异。通过模式混合分析,在未早期退出研究的野生型 KRAS mCRC 患者中,帕尼单抗相对于 BSC 的优势更为明显。在突变型 KRAS mCRC 患者中,两组间无差异。
与单独接受 BSC 相比,野生型 KRAS mCRC 患者接受帕尼单抗治疗可更好地控制 CRC 症状和生活质量,从而进一步了解帕尼单抗治疗的获益不仅限于无进展生存期的改善。