Fallahi Babak, Beiki Davood, Fard-Esfahani Armaghan, Akbarpour Saeed, Abolhassani Arash, Kakhki Vahid Reza Dabbagh, Eftekhari Mohammad
Research Institute for Nuclear Medicine, Tehran University of Medicla Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hell J Nucl Med. 2010 Sep-Dec;13(3):246-52.
The prognostic value of transient ischemic dilation (TID) has been previously confirmed; however, its clinical significance for screening coronary artery disease (CAD) with balanced ischemia, as a cause of false negative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), is unclear. The goal of this study was to determine the additive diagnostic value of TID ratio for screening CAD in separate subgroups of diabetic and non-diabetics with normal perfusion. Eighty six patients with intermediate probability of CAD who had TID more than one in the presence of otherwise normal MPI using two-day technetium-99m methoxy isobutyl isonitrile ((99m)Tc-MIBI) single photon emission tomography (SPET) and dipyridamole stress (summed stress score<3 and left ventricular cavity<90 mL) were included in a prospective cohort study comprising two subgroups of diabetic and non- diabetic patients. An inclusive work-up with multiple noninvasive tests was performed for all patients from whom 38 cases subsequently underwent coronary angiography and 48 cases were categorized in the group with a very low likelihood (<5%) of CAD on the basis of clinical and paraclinical data over a minimum of 18 months follow up. The TID ratio was calculated using automated software. Gensini score (GS) as an indicator of severity/extent of stenosis and coronary artery index (CAI) as the number of arteries with more than 50% narrowing were calculated based on angiographic findings. Our results showed that only in diabetic patients with three-vessel disease, TID ratio (1.47 ± 0.23) differs significantly from the other groups of CAD. In diabetic patients subgroup, TID ratio correlated strongly with GS (r=0.957, P<0.0001) and CAI (r=0.659, P=0.001), while such correlations were not seen in the non-diabetic patients. On the basis of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for screening CAD in diabetic patients with normal myocardial perfusion, 100% sensitivity and 77.8% normalcy rate were achieved when TID more than 1.16 was regarded as abnormal. No distinct cut-off value for abnormal TID was obtained in the non-diabetic patients. In conclusion, TID in diabetic patients without regional myocardial perfusion abnormality is an important sign of CAD especially when TID ratio exceeds 1.16. The higher TID ratio in these cases may predict increasing possibility of severe and extensive CAD. The value of TID in non-diabetic patients with otherwise normal MPI is not clearly determined.
短暂性缺血性扩张(TID)的预后价值此前已得到证实;然而,其作为心肌灌注成像(MPI)假阴性原因之一,在筛查存在均衡性缺血的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)方面的临床意义尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定TID比值在糖尿病和非糖尿病且灌注正常的亚组中筛查CAD的附加诊断价值。86例CAD中度可能性患者,在使用两日锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈((99m)Tc-MIBI)单光子发射断层扫描(SPET)和双嘧达莫负荷试验(总负荷评分<3且左心室腔<90 mL)时TID大于1且MPI其他方面正常,这些患者被纳入一项前瞻性队列研究,该研究包括糖尿病和非糖尿病患者两个亚组。对所有患者进行了多项非侵入性检查的全面评估,其中38例随后接受了冠状动脉造影,48例根据临床和辅助临床数据在至少18个月的随访中被归类为CAD可能性极低(<5%)的组。TID比值使用自动化软件计算。根据血管造影结果计算Gensini评分(GS)作为狭窄严重程度/范围的指标,以及冠状动脉指数(CAI)作为狭窄超过50%的动脉数量。我们的结果表明,仅在患有三支血管病变的糖尿病患者中,TID比值(1.47±0.23)与其他CAD组有显著差异。在糖尿病患者亚组中,TID比值与GS(r=0.957,P<0.0001)和CAI(r=0.659,P=0.001)密切相关,而在非糖尿病患者中未观察到这种相关性。基于对心肌灌注正常的糖尿病患者筛查CAD的受试者操作特征曲线分析,当TID大于1.16被视为异常时,灵敏度达到100%,正常率达到77.8%。在非糖尿病患者中未获得异常TID的明确临界值。总之,在无局部心肌灌注异常的糖尿病患者中,TID是CAD的重要征象,尤其是当TID比值超过1.16时。这些病例中较高的TID比值可能预示着严重和广泛CAD的可能性增加。在MPI其他方面正常的非糖尿病患者中,TID的价值尚未明确确定。