Golzar Yasmeen, Olusanya Adebayo, Pe Nadith, Dua Sumeet G, Golzar Jaafer, Gidea Claudia, Doukky Rami
Division of Cardiology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Jun;22(3):526-34. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0087-6. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
The critical threshold and clinical significance of transient ischemic dilation (TID) for regadenoson, single-isotope (99m)Tc SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) are not defined.
From 100 patients with low likelihood of CAD, we derived the abnormal TID threshold (mean + 2 SD). We validated the threshold in a cohort of 547 patients who received one-day, rest/regadenoson-stress, (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT-MPI followed by coronary angiography within 6 months. Patients were classified into three CAD severity strata: no significant CAD, mild to moderate CAD, and severe and extensive CAD.
The abnormal TID threshold was determined to be 1.31. Though mean TID ratios were different between the three CAD severity groups and the derivation cohort (P < .001), there was no difference in the mean TID ratios between the categories of CAD severity or in the prevalence of severe CAD between TID+ and TID- groups (P = .74). By ROC analysis, TID had a poor discriminatory capacity in identifying severe and extensive CAD [AUC of 0.55 (95% CI 0.47-0.62, P = .25)]. Stepwise multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that adding TID to clinical and perfusion data did not provide incremental diagnostic value (P = .87).
The clinical utility of TID with regadenoson-stress MPI in this era of declining CAD burden is questionable.
对于雷加曲班,单同位素(99m)锝 SPECT 心肌灌注成像(MPI)中短暂性缺血性扩张(TID)的临界阈值及临床意义尚未明确。
我们从 100 例冠心病可能性较低的患者中得出异常 TID 阈值(均值 + 2 标准差)。我们在一组 547 例患者中验证了该阈值,这些患者接受了一日的静息/雷加曲班负荷(99m)锝替曲膦 SPECT - MPI 检查,并在 6 个月内进行了冠状动脉造影。患者被分为三个冠心病严重程度分层:无显著冠心病、轻度至中度冠心病以及重度和广泛冠心病。
确定异常 TID 阈值为 1.31。尽管三个冠心病严重程度组与推导队列之间的平均 TID 比值不同(P <.001),但冠心病严重程度类别之间的平均 TID 比值或 TID + 组与 TID - 组之间重度冠心病的患病率并无差异(P =.74)。通过 ROC 分析,TID 在识别重度和广泛冠心病方面的鉴别能力较差 [曲线下面积为 0.55(95%可信区间 0.47 - 0.62,P =.25)]。逐步多变量逻辑分析表明,将 TID 添加到临床和灌注数据中并未提供额外的诊断价值(P =.87)。
在这个冠心病负担不断下降的时代,雷加曲班负荷 MPI 中 TID 的临床实用性值得怀疑。