Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Ryde NSW, Australia.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Jan;12(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
To test different adherent strategies aimed at improving hip protector use among nursing care facility residents.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cluster randomized controlled trial with 234 residents older than 75 years from 9 units of 7 nursing care facilities in the Northern Sydney region, Australia.
Residents were cluster randomized in 3 groups. The first group received hard shell hip protectors without cost (no cost group). The second group received an educational session, a demonstration of the use of hip protectors, and free choice of type of hip protectors without cost (combined group). The third group was the control group who received a brochure about hip protectors.
Primary outcome was adherence with the use of hip protectors at 3 and 6 months after recruitment. Secondary outcomes were falls, injuries, and fractures.
No participants in the control group purchased hip protectors at any stage. At 3 months, 33% of participants in the no cost group and 27% in the combined group wore a hip protector at the time of visit. This declined to 25% and 24% respectively at 6 months. No significant difference was seen in any of the 3 adherence outcomes between the 2 intervention groups. The number of falls or hospitalizations did not differ between groups, with 5 hip fractures reported during the intervention period. Residents were more likely to be adherent if they were female and had greater restriction in daily activities.
Providing free hip protectors to older people living in nursing care facilities was necessary to increase initial acceptance and adherence. Nevertheless, after 6 months the achieved level of adherence was not high enough to be associated with a reduction of hip fractures. The provision of educational sessions and demonstrations to nursing staff and participants had no added value in this trial.
测试不同的坚持策略,旨在提高护理院居民使用髋保护器。
设计、设置和参与者:一项在澳大利亚北部悉尼地区的 7 家护理院的 9 个单元中,对 234 名 75 岁以上的居民进行的集群随机对照试验。
居民被分为 3 组进行集群随机化。第一组免费获得硬壳髋保护器(无成本组)。第二组接受教育课程、髋保护器使用演示以及免费选择类型的髋保护器(联合组)。第三组为对照组,接受髋保护器小册子。
主要结果是招募后 3 个月和 6 个月时髋保护器的使用依从性。次要结果是跌倒、受伤和骨折。
对照组的参与者在任何阶段都没有购买髋保护器。在 3 个月时,无成本组和联合组的 33%和 27%的参与者在访问时佩戴髋保护器。这一比例在 6 个月时分别下降到 25%和 24%。在任何 3 个依从性结果中,两组之间均未发现显著差异。各组之间的跌倒或住院人数没有差异,在干预期间报告了 5 例髋部骨折。如果居民是女性且日常活动受限,他们更有可能坚持使用髋保护器。
为居住在护理院的老年人提供免费髋保护器是增加初始接受度和依从性的必要条件。然而,6 个月后,实现的依从水平还不足以与髋部骨折的减少相关。在这项试验中,向护理人员和参与者提供教育课程和演示没有附加价值。