Cameron I D, Venman J, Kurrle S E, Lockwood K, Birks C, Cumming R G, Quine S, Bashford G
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, PO Box 6, Ryde, NSW 1680, Australia.
Age Ageing. 2001 Nov;30(6):477-81. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.6.477.
To investigate the effect of use of external hip protectors on occurrence of hip fracture.
Randomized controlled trial, with randomization at the individual level.
residential aged-care facilities in urban areas of New South Wales, Australia.
174 women, aged 75 years and older, who had had two or more falls or one fall requiring hospital admission in the previous 3 months, and who lived in hostels or nursing homes. Eighty-six subjects were in the intervention group and 88 in the control group.
Use of external hip protectors and encouragement by nurses to use the protectors.
Follow-up visits at approximately 2 weeks and 2, 10 and 18 months to determine falls and fall injury (including hip fracture); we also measured adherence to hip protector use.
The mean age of participants was 85; they lived in 32 different aged-care facilities, two-thirds of which were nursing homes. Intervention and control groups had similar baseline characteristics, with a mean Barthel index of 58 at enrollment and a mean Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire score of six errors, indicating severe disability and major cognitive impairment. During follow-up, a mean of 4.6 falls per person occurred. There was no difference in mortality, with 28 deaths in each group. Eight hip fractures occurred in the intervention group and seven in the control group (hazard ratio 1.46; 95% confidence interval 0.53-4.51). No hip fractures occurred when hip protectors were being worn as directed. Adherence was about 57% over the duration of the study and hip protectors were worn at the time of 54% of falls in the intervention group. Adherence varied markedly between institutions, but the greatest was about 80%.
Hip protectors were not effective in reducing the incidence of hip fractures in this study, but because of low statistical power, a reduction in risk of hip fracture of up to 50% may not have been detected. There was limited adherence with their use, resulting in a large number of falls occurring without hip protectors in place. All hip fractures in the intervention group occurred when hip protectors were not being used.
探讨使用外部髋部保护器对髋部骨折发生率的影响。
个体水平随机对照试验。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州城市地区的老年护理机构。
174名75岁及以上的女性,她们在过去3个月内有过两次或更多次跌倒,或有一次跌倒需要住院治疗,且居住在宿舍或养老院。干预组86名受试者,对照组88名。
使用外部髋部保护器,并由护士鼓励使用保护器。
在大约2周、2个月、10个月和18个月时进行随访,以确定跌倒和跌倒损伤情况(包括髋部骨折);我们还测量了髋部保护器的使用依从性。
参与者的平均年龄为85岁;她们居住在32个不同的老年护理机构,其中三分之二是养老院。干预组和对照组的基线特征相似,入组时巴氏指数平均为58,简易便携式精神状态问卷平均得分有6个错误,表明存在严重残疾和严重认知障碍。在随访期间,每人平均跌倒4.6次。两组死亡率无差异,每组均有28例死亡。干预组发生8例髋部骨折,对照组发生7例(风险比1.46;95%置信区间0.53 - 4.51)。按照指示佩戴髋部保护器时未发生髋部骨折。在研究期间,依从性约为57%,干预组54%的跌倒发生时佩戴了髋部保护器。机构之间的依从性差异显著,但最高约为80%。
在本研究中,髋部保护器在降低髋部骨折发生率方面无效,但由于统计效能较低,可能未检测到高达50%的髋部骨折风险降低。其使用依从性有限,导致大量跌倒发生时未佩戴髋部保护器。干预组所有髋部骨折均发生在未使用髋部保护器时。