Suppr超能文献

真实关系量表:客户形式的发展和心理测量研究。

The real relationship inventory: development and psychometric investigation of the client form.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Counseling, Carlow University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010 Dec;47(4):540-53. doi: 10.1037/a0022082.

Abstract

The development and validation of a client version of the Real Relationship Inventory (RRI-C) is reported. Using a sample of clients (n = 94) who were currently in psychotherapy, a 24-item measure was developed consisting of two subscales (Realism and Genuineness) and a total score. This 24-item version and other measures used for validation were completed by 93 additional clients. Results of the present study offer initial support for the validity and reliability of the RRI-C. The RRI-C correlated significantly in theoretically expected ways with measures of the client-rated working alliance and therapists' congruence, clients' observing ego, and client ratings of client and therapist real relationship on an earlier measure of the real relationship (Eugster & Wampold, 1996). A nonsignificant relation was found between the RRI-C and a measure of social desirability, providing support for discriminant validity. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the two theorized factors of the RRI-C. The authors discuss the importance of measuring clients' perceptions of the real relationship.

摘要

报告了真实关系量表(RRI-C)客户版本的开发和验证。使用当前正在接受心理治疗的 94 名客户的样本,开发了一个由两个分量表(现实主义和真实性)和一个总分组成的 24 项测度。该 24 项版本和其他用于验证的测度由另外 93 名客户完成。本研究的结果初步支持了 RRI-C 的有效性和可靠性。RRI-C 与客户评定的工作联盟和治疗师的一致性、客户的观察自我以及客户对真实关系的评定等测度显著相关,这些测度与更早的真实关系测度(Eugster & Wampold, 1996)上的治疗师真实关系的评定具有理论预期的关系。RRI-C 与社会期望性测度之间存在非显著关系,这为区分效度提供了支持。验证性因素分析支持了 RRI-C 的两个理论因素。作者讨论了衡量客户对真实关系的看法的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验