Cardiothoracic Centre Department of Endocrinology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011 May;74(5):608-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03973.x.
Chronic low-dose cabergoline treatment for microprolactinoma may cause cardiac valve pathology, but the evidence is contradictory. We investigated whether the expectation of the echocardiographer could influence the report.
Transthoracic echocardiograms from 40 patients aged 49·3 ± 9·6 (mean ± SD) years (Men:Women 7:33) on long-term cabergoline and bromocriptine therapy (duration 9·94 ± 4·5 years) were randomly assigned to two groups of echocardiographers so that each echocardiogram was reported twice. One group was told that 'the patients were control subjects' (Group A) and the other that 'the patients were on dopamine agonist therapy which is known to cause valve disease' (Group B). An observer who was blind to the group scored the reports for regurgitation at each valve (scores 0-4; max 16 per case).
Mean total regurgitation score was significantly higher in Group B (1·43 ± 1·28; P = 0·014) than in Group A (0·73 ± 1·30). The difference was mainly from reporting trivial regurgitation: (mitral 16 vs 5, P = 0·005; tricuspid 17 vs 6, P = 0·007 and pulmonary 8 vs 1, P = 0·013). Mild regurgitation was uncommon (mitral 1 vs 1 and tricuspid 3 vs 6). Moderate regurgitation occurred in only one case and was associated with restriction of the leaflets consistent with the effects of cabergoline. Valve thickening was not reported in Group A, but in 9 (23%) mitral and 4 (10%) aortic valves in Group B.
Long-term, low-dose dopamine agonist therapy rarely causes cardiac valve disease, but operator bias can lead to over-reporting of both valve thickening and trivial regurgitation.
慢性低剂量卡麦角林治疗微腺瘤可能导致心瓣膜病变,但证据相互矛盾。我们研究了超声心动图医师的预期是否会影响报告。
将 40 名年龄 49.3 ± 9.6(均值 ± 标准差)岁(男:女 7:33)的长期接受卡麦角林和溴隐亭治疗(持续时间 9.94 ± 4.5 年)的患者的经胸超声心动图随机分为两组超声心动图医师,以便对每张超声心动图进行两次报告。一组被告知“患者是对照者”(A 组),另一组被告知“患者正在接受多巴胺激动剂治疗,已知这种治疗会导致瓣膜疾病”(B 组)。一名对分组情况不知情的观察者对每个瓣膜的反流情况进行评分(评分 0-4;每例最高 16 分)。
B 组的总反流评分(1.43 ± 1.28)明显高于 A 组(0.73 ± 1.30)(P = 0.014)。差异主要来自于报告微量反流:(二尖瓣 16 比 5,P = 0.005;三尖瓣 17 比 6,P = 0.007 和肺动脉瓣 8 比 1,P = 0.013)。轻度反流罕见(二尖瓣 1 比 1 和三尖瓣 3 比 6)。仅 1 例出现中度反流,与卡麦角林的作用导致的瓣叶受限有关。A 组未报告瓣膜增厚,但 B 组有 9 例(23%)二尖瓣和 4 例(10%)主动脉瓣增厚。
长期低剂量多巴胺激动剂治疗很少引起心脏瓣膜疾病,但操作者偏见可能导致瓣膜增厚和微量反流的过度报告。