Suppr超能文献

普瑞巴林治疗难治性颈痛的效果:来自矫形外科和康复诊所医疗实践的成本和临床证据。

Effect of pregabalin in the treatment of refractory neck pain: cost and clinical evidence from medical practice in orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation clinics.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Unit, Foundation Hospital Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2011 Jul-Aug;11(4):369-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00430.x. Epub 2010 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study aims to prospectively analyze the effect of adding pregabalin upon costs and consequences in the treatment of refractory neck pain under routine medical practice.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was carried out including patients over 18 years, with 6-month chronic neck pain refractory from a prospective, naturalistic, 12-week two-visit study. The analysis compared patients adding pregabalin to its therapy vs. usual care. Severity of pain, healthcare resources utilization, lost workday equivalents (LWDE) because of pain, and related cost-adjusted reductions were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients (65.3% women, age 54.2 [12.1] years), 78.2% receiving pregabalin, were analyzed. Adding pregabalin was associated with higher adjusted reduction in pain severity: -3.2 (1.8) points, 55.4% responders (≥50% baseline pain reduction) vs. -2.3 (2.0) and 38.2%, respectively; P<0.001, yielding a higher reduction in mean LWDE: 20.1 (23.1) vs. 8.2 (22.4); P=0.014, which produced significant reductions in the indirect components of cost: €1,041.0 (1,222.8) vs. €457.3 (1,132.1), P=0.028. The costs of pregabalin (€309.8 [193.2] vs. €26.4 [79.6], P<0.001) was offset by higher numerical reductions in the other components of costs, producing similar direct cost reductions in both groups at the end of the study: €66.8 (1,080.8) and €143.5 (1,922.4), respectively; P=0.295.

CONCLUSION

Compared with usual care, the addition of pregabalin to treat refractory neck pain seems to be associated with a higher reduction in pain severity and lost work-days equivalents, which in turn results in a greater reduction of the indirect components of cost while maintaining similar healthcare cost levels despite its higher price.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在前瞻性分析在常规医疗实践中,加用普瑞巴林治疗难治性颈痛对成本和结果的影响。

方法

对一项前瞻性、自然史、12 周两访的 18 岁以上、6 个月慢性颈痛且对治疗抵抗的患者进行二次分析。分析比较了加用普瑞巴林治疗与常规治疗的患者。评估疼痛严重程度、医疗资源利用、因疼痛而损失的工作当量(LWDE)以及相关的成本调整减少。

结果

共纳入 312 例患者(65.3%为女性,年龄 54.2[12.1]岁),78.2%接受普瑞巴林治疗。加用普瑞巴林与疼痛严重程度的调整后降幅更大有关:-3.2(1.8)点,55.4%的患者为(≥50%基线疼痛缓解),而分别为-2.3(2.0)和 38.2%;P<0.001,导致 LWDE 的平均降幅更高:20.1(23.1)与 8.2(22.4);P=0.014,这导致成本的间接组成部分显著降低:1041.0(1222.8)与 457.3(1132.1)欧元;P=0.028。普瑞巴林的成本(309.8[193.2]与 26.4[79.6]欧元;P<0.001)被其他成本组成部分更高的数值降低所抵消,导致两组在研究结束时的直接成本相似降低:66.8(1080.8)与 143.5(1922.4)欧元;P=0.295。

结论

与常规治疗相比,在治疗难治性颈痛时加用普瑞巴林似乎与疼痛严重程度和工作天数减少的降低幅度更大有关,这反过来又导致间接成本组成部分的更大降低,同时尽管价格较高,但维持了类似的医疗保健成本水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验