Suppr超能文献

普瑞巴林治疗脊柱疾病患者神经性疼痛的有效性:日本两项多中心观察性研究的汇总分析

Effectiveness of Pregabalin Treatment for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Spine Diseases: A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter Observational Studies in Japan.

作者信息

Taguchi Toshihiko, Nakano Shogo, Nozawa Kazutaka

机构信息

Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Sanyo-Onoda, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Pfizer Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2021 Mar 16;14:757-771. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S293556. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Neuropathic pain (NeP) is common among patients with chronic pain associated with spine diseases. Practical effectiveness of pregabalin, one of the first-line treatments for NeP, has not been evaluated in an entire population of patients with spine diseases, including various pathophysiological conditions. This pooled analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic value of pregabalin for chronic pain with NeP component in patients with spine diseases in routine primary care settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We pooled data from two 8-week prospective observational cohort studies for patients with chronic low back pain with accompanying lower limb pain (NeP component), and patients with chronic cervical pain and accompanying upper limb radiating pain (NeP component) in routine primary care settings in Japan. For both studies, patients were treated for 8 weeks with pregabalin (alone/with other analgesics) or usual care with conventional analgesics (eg, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Changes in pain numerical rating scale (NRS), Pain-Related Sleep Interference Scale (PRSIS), and EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) scores from baseline to week 8 were summarized and compared between the pregabalin and usual care groups, and also for subgroups of primary diagnosis. Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs) in the pregabalin group.

RESULTS

The pooled dataset comprised 700 patients (pregabalin group: 302; usual care group: 398). All patient-reported outcomes (PRO) scores significantly improved from baseline to week 8 in the pregabalin than in the usual care group (NRS: P<0.0001; PRSIS: P<0.0001, and EQ-5D-5L: P=0.0006). Overall, all three PRO measures showed greater improvement in the pregabalin than in the usual care group, irrespective of the primary diagnosis. AEs were reported in 36.1% of the pregabalin group.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggested multi-faceted effectiveness of treatment with pregabalin from the patient's perspectives under a "real-world" practice in all patients with chronic NeP from various spine diseases.

摘要

目的

神经性疼痛(NeP)在患有与脊柱疾病相关的慢性疼痛的患者中很常见。普瑞巴林作为NeP的一线治疗药物之一,其实际疗效尚未在包括各种病理生理状况的脊柱疾病患者总体中得到评估。这项汇总分析旨在评估在常规初级保健环境中,普瑞巴林对患有脊柱疾病且伴有NeP成分的慢性疼痛患者的治疗价值。

患者与方法

我们汇总了两项为期8周的前瞻性观察队列研究的数据,研究对象为日本常规初级保健环境中患有慢性下腰痛并伴有下肢疼痛(NeP成分)的患者,以及患有慢性颈痛并伴有上肢放射性疼痛(NeP成分)的患者。在这两项研究中,患者接受了8周的普瑞巴林治疗(单独使用/与其他镇痛药联合使用)或常规镇痛药(如非甾体抗炎药)的常规治疗。总结并比较了普瑞巴林组和常规治疗组从基线到第8周疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)、疼痛相关睡眠干扰量表(PRSIS)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)评分的变化,以及主要诊断亚组的变化。通过普瑞巴林组的不良事件(AE)评估安全性。

结果

汇总数据集包括700名患者(普瑞巴林组:302名;常规治疗组:398名)。与常规治疗组相比,普瑞巴林组从基线到第8周所有患者报告结局(PRO)评分均显著改善(NRS:P<0.0001;PRSIS:P<0.0001,EQ-5D-5L:P=0.0006)。总体而言,无论主要诊断如何,所有三项PRO指标在普瑞巴林组中的改善均大于常规治疗组。普瑞巴林组有36.1%的患者报告了不良事件。

结论

该分析表明,在“真实世界”实践中,对于所有患有各种脊柱疾病慢性NeP的患者,从患者角度来看,普瑞巴林治疗具有多方面疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0213/7981152/80c3d5ac6e1d/JPR-14-757-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验