Departments of Kinesiology, Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2011 Jul;202(3):293-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02246.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
The O(2) requirements of contracting skeletal muscle may increase 100-fold above rest. In 1919, August Krogh's brilliant insights recognized the capillary as the principal site for this increased blood-myocyte O(2) flux. Based on the premise that most capillaries did not sustain RBC flux at rest, Krogh proposed that capillary recruitment [i.e. initiation of red blood cell (RBC) flux in previously non-flowing capillaries] increased the capillary surface area available for O(2) flux and reduced mean capillary-to-mitochondrial diffusion distances. More modern experimental approaches reveal that most muscle capillaries may support RBC flux at rest. Thus, rather than contraction-induced capillary recruitment per se, increased RBC flux and haematocrit within already-flowing capillaries probably elevate perfusive and diffusive O(2) conductances and hence blood-myocyte O(2) flux. Additional surface area for O(2) exchange is recruited but, crucially, this may occur along the length of already-flowing capillaries (i.e. longitudinal recruitment). Today, the capillary is still considered the principal site for O(2) and substrate delivery to contracting skeletal muscle. Indeed, the presence of very low intramyocyte O(2) partial pressures (PO(2)s) and the absence of intramyocyte PO(2) gradients, whilst refuting the relevance of diffusion distances, place an even greater importance on capillary hemodynamics. This emergent picture calls for a paradigm-shift in our understanding of the function of capillaries by de-emphasizing de novo'capillary recruitment'. Diseases such as heart failure impair blood-myocyte O(2) flux, in part, by decreasing the proportion of RBC-flowing capillaries. Knowledge of capillary function in healthy muscle is requisite for identification of pathology and efficient design of therapeutic treatments.
收缩骨骼肌的 O(2)需求可能会增加到休息时的 100 倍以上。1919 年,August Krogh 的卓越洞察力认识到毛细血管是血液-肌细胞 O(2)流量增加的主要部位。基于大多数毛细血管在休息时不维持 RBC 流量的前提,Krogh 提出毛细血管募集[即在以前无血流的毛细血管中启动 RBC 流量]增加了可用的毛细血管表面积来进行 O(2)流量,并减少了平均毛细血管-线粒体扩散距离。更现代的实验方法揭示,大多数肌肉毛细血管在休息时可能支持 RBC 流量。因此,与其说是收缩引起的毛细血管募集本身,不如说是已经流动的毛细血管内 RBC 流量和血细胞比容的增加,可能会提高灌注和扩散 O(2)传导率,从而提高血液-肌细胞 O(2)流量。额外的 O(2)交换表面积被募集,但至关重要的是,这可能沿着已经流动的毛细血管(即纵向募集)发生。如今,毛细血管仍然被认为是收缩骨骼肌 O(2)和底物输送的主要部位。事实上,细胞内非常低的 O(2)分压(PO(2)s)和缺乏细胞内 PO(2)梯度,尽管反驳了扩散距离的相关性,但对毛细血管血液动力学的重要性更大。这种新出现的情况要求我们改变对毛细血管功能的理解,不再强调“新的”毛细血管募集。心力衰竭等疾病通过降低 RBC 流动毛细血管的比例来损害血液-肌细胞 O(2)流量,对毛细血管功能的了解是识别病理学和有效设计治疗方法的必要条件。