Department of Immunology Department of Family Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Int J Rheum Dis. 2010 Oct;13(4):335-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2010.01552.x.
BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid factors (RF) are currently used in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Several other autoantibodies found in RA are directed to epitopes in citrullinated proteins such as anti-cyclic citrullinated and recently anti-modified citrullinated vimentin (MCV). OBJECTIVE: In this study we determined the sensitivity and specificity of anti-MCV in comparison with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies and RF in RA patients and in a control group using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted from January to December 2008 on 100 patients with RA and 153 patients with arthritis or arthralgia but not fulfilling ACR criteria for RA. Serum from each subject was tested for anti-MCV, anti-CCP antibodies and immunoglobulin G (IgG) RF by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Sensitivity and specificity of the tests were evaluated using the ACR criteria as the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of RF was 85% with 74.5% specificity. For anti-CCP antibodies the sensitivity was 71% and the specificity was 94.8%. The sensitivity of anti-MCV antibodies was 80% with 59.5% specificity. The area under the curve for RF was 0.759, for anti-CCP antibodies was 0.866 and for anti-MCV antibodies was 0.681, while for at least one positive test it was 0.691. CONCLUSION: Anti-CCP antibodies have higher diagnostic specificity and positive predictive value than RF and anti-MCV antibodies. RF has the highest sensitivity when compared to anti-CCP and anti-MCV antibodies. Thus anti-MCV antibody is not a better marker when compared to RF or anti-MCV antibody in the diagnosis of RA patients.
背景:类风湿因子(RF)目前用于类风湿关节炎(RA)的诊断。RA 中发现的其他几种自身抗体针对瓜氨酸化蛋白中的表位,例如抗环瓜氨酸肽(CCP)抗体和最近的抗修饰瓜氨酸化波形蛋白(MCV)抗体。 目的:本研究通过美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准作为金标准,比较抗 MCV 与抗 CCP 抗体和 RF 在 RA 患者和对照组中的敏感性和特异性。 材料和方法:2008 年 1 月至 12 月进行了一项横断面研究,纳入 100 例 RA 患者和 153 例关节炎或关节痛患者,但不符合 ACR 诊断 RA 的标准。每位患者的血清均通过酶联免疫吸附试验检测抗 MCV、抗 CCP 抗体和免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)RF。使用 ACR 标准作为金标准评估测试的敏感性和特异性。 结果:RF 的敏感性为 85%,特异性为 74.5%。抗 CCP 抗体的敏感性为 71%,特异性为 94.8%。抗 MCV 抗体的敏感性为 80%,特异性为 59.5%。RF 的曲线下面积为 0.759,抗 CCP 抗体为 0.866,抗 MCV 抗体为 0.681,而至少一项阳性检测的曲线下面积为 0.691。 结论:抗 CCP 抗体的诊断特异性和阳性预测值均高于 RF 和抗 MCV 抗体。与抗 CCP 和抗 MCV 抗体相比,RF 的敏感性最高。因此,与 RF 或抗 MCV 抗体相比,抗 MCV 抗体在诊断 RA 患者时并不是更好的标志物。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2010-10