Nathan R S, Perel J M, Pollock B G, Kupfer D J
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1990 Sep;51(9):367-72.
Forty patients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder were entered in a double-blind study to assess comparative clinical response and pharmacologic parameters of fluvoxamine, a highly selective blocker of serotonin reuptake, and desipramine, a noradrenergic agent. Eighteen patients receiving desipramine and 17 patients receiving fluvoxamine completed the study. Fluvoxamine was comparable to desipramine in its antidepressant efficacy and was better tolerated and caused minimal side effects. There was a direct linear relationship between plasma fluvoxamine levels and clinical response and a nonlinear relationship between plasma desipramine levels and clinical response. The pharmacologic specificity of the two drugs was assessed by determining uptake inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine. The authors found a positive relationship between Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores and norepinephrine uptake inhibition for desipramine but found no such relationship between fluvoxamine and serotonin uptake inhibition. Although there was a clear-cut difference in the quality of pharmacologic specificity and a partial relationship to clinical response, the authors were unable to identify neuropharmacologic factors that would predict either treatment response or selective amelioration of symptomatologies in this patient population.
40名被诊断为重度抑郁症的患者参与了一项双盲研究,以评估5-羟色胺再摄取的高度选择性阻滞剂氟伏沙明和去甲肾上腺素能药物地昔帕明的临床反应及药理学参数比较。18名接受地昔帕明治疗的患者和17名接受氟伏沙明治疗的患者完成了该研究。氟伏沙明在抗抑郁疗效上与地昔帕明相当,耐受性更好且副作用最小。血浆氟伏沙明水平与临床反应之间存在直接线性关系,而血浆地昔帕明水平与临床反应之间存在非线性关系。通过测定5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素的摄取抑制来评估这两种药物的药理学特异性。作者发现地昔帕明的汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分与去甲肾上腺素摄取抑制之间存在正相关关系,但氟伏沙明与5-羟色胺摄取抑制之间未发现此类关系。尽管在药理学特异性质量方面存在明显差异且与临床反应存在部分关联,但作者无法确定能预测该患者群体治疗反应或症状选择性改善的神经药理学因素。