Department of Anthropology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 28;5(12):e14432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014432.
In the Plio-Pleistocene, the hominin foot evolved from a grasping appendage to a stiff, propulsive lever. Central to this transition was the development of the longitudinal arch, a structure that helps store elastic energy and stiffen the foot during bipedal locomotion. Direct evidence for arch evolution, however, has been somewhat elusive given the failure of soft-tissue to fossilize. Paleoanthropologists have relied on footprints and bony correlates of arch development, though little consensus has emerged as to when the arch evolved.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we present evidence from radiographs of modern humans (n = 261) that the set of the distal tibia in the sagittal plane, henceforth referred to as the tibial arch angle, is related to rearfoot arching. Non-human primates have a posteriorly directed tibial arch angle, while most humans have an anteriorly directed tibial arch angle. Those humans with a posteriorly directed tibial arch angle (8%) have significantly lower talocalcaneal and talar declination angles, both measures of an asymptomatic flatfoot. Application of these results to the hominin fossil record reveals that a well developed rearfoot arch had evolved in Australopithecus afarensis. However, as in humans today, Australopithecus populations exhibited individual variation in foot morphology and arch development, and "Lucy" (A.L. 288-1), a 3.18 Myr-old female Australopithecus, likely possessed asymptomatic flat feet. Additional distal tibiae from the Plio-Pleistocene show variation in tibial arch angles, including two early Homo tibiae that also have slightly posteriorly directed tibial arch angles.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study finds that the rearfoot arch was present in the genus Australopithecus. However, the female Australopithecus afarensis "Lucy" has an ankle morphology consistent with non-pathological flat-footedness. This study suggests that, as in humans today, there was variation in arch development in Plio-Pleistocene hominins.
在更新世,人类的足部从抓握的附肢演变为僵硬的推进杠杆。这一转变的核心是纵弓的发展,纵弓是一种有助于在双足运动中储存弹性能量并使足部变硬的结构。然而,由于软组织无法化石,直接证明足弓进化的证据有些难以捉摸。古人类学家依赖于足迹和足弓发育的骨骼相关性,尽管对于足弓何时进化,尚未达成共识。
方法/主要发现:在这里,我们通过对 261 名现代人的 X 光片提供证据,证明矢状面上远端胫骨的设置,即胫骨弓角度,与后足足弓有关。非人类灵长类动物的胫骨弓角度向后,而大多数人类的胫骨弓角度向前。那些胫骨弓角度向后(8%)的人,距跟角和距骨倾斜角明显较低,这两个都是无症状扁平足的指标。将这些结果应用于人类化石记录表明,阿法南方古猿已经进化出了发达的后足足弓。然而,与今天的人类一样,阿法南方古猿种群在足部形态和足弓发育方面表现出个体差异,而 318 万年前的女性阿法南方古猿“露西”(AL 288-1)可能患有无症状扁平足。来自更新世的额外的远端胫骨显示出胫骨弓角度的变化,包括两个早期的人类胫骨,它们也有轻微向后的胫骨弓角度。
结论/意义:本研究发现,后足弓存在于南方古猿属中。然而,雌性阿法南方古猿“露西”的踝关节形态与非病理性扁平足一致。本研究表明,与今天的人类一样,更新世人类的足弓发育存在差异。