Psychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA.
J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):875-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00709.x.
Since the inception of the empirical study of personality, and even before it, individual differences in anxiety and distress have been viewed as key predictors of behavioral performance. Yet such literatures have always entertained 2 perspectives, one contending that anxious individuals are "driven" and the other contending that anxious individuals are "distracted." The present 3 studies (total N=289) sought to reconcile such discrepant views according to an ex-Gaussian parsing of reaction time performance tendencies in basic cognitive tasks. As hypothesized, a particular pattern marked by faster responding on the preponderance of trials (in terms of the ex-Gaussian μ parameter) in combination with slower responding on other trials (in terms of the ex-Gaussian τ parameter) was predictive of higher levels of anxiety. Implications for understanding neuroticism, distress, the anxiety-performance interface, and cognitive models of personality processes are discussed.
自人格的实证研究出现以来,甚至在此之前,焦虑和痛苦的个体差异就一直被视为行为表现的关键预测因素。然而,此类文献一直存在两种观点,一种观点认为焦虑的个体是“被驱动的”,另一种观点则认为焦虑的个体是“分心的”。本研究(共 289 人)根据基本认知任务中反应时表现倾向的超伽马函数分析,试图调和这种不一致的观点。正如假设的那样,一种特殊的模式表现为在大多数试验中(根据超伽马函数 μ 参数)反应更快,而在其他试验中(根据超伽马函数 τ 参数)反应更慢,这与更高水平的焦虑相关。讨论了对神经质、痛苦、焦虑表现界面以及人格过程的认知模型的理解的影响。