Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.
J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):1013-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x.
Evidence has accrued to suggest that there are 2 distinct dimensions of narcissism, which are often labeled grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Although individuals high on either of these dimensions interact with others in an antagonistic manner, they differ on other central constructs (e.g., Neuroticism, Extraversion). In the current study, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis of 3 prominent self-report measures of narcissism (N=858) to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the resultant factors. A 2-factor structure was found, which supported the notion that these scales include content consistent with 2 relatively distinct constructs: grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. We then compared the similarity of the nomological networks of these dimensions in relation to indices of personality, interpersonal behavior, and psychopathology in a sample of undergraduates (n=238). Overall, the nomological networks of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism were unrelated. The current results support the need for a more explicit parsing of the narcissism construct at the level of conceptualization and assessment.
有证据表明,自恋有两个明显的维度,通常被标记为浮夸型和脆弱型自恋。尽管这两个维度上的个体都以一种敌对的方式与他人互动,但他们在其他核心结构上存在差异(例如,神经质、外向性)。在当前的研究中,我们对 3 种著名的自恋自评量表(N=858)进行了探索性因素分析,以检验所得因素的聚合和区分效度。发现了一个 2 因素结构,这支持了这些量表包含与 2 个相对不同的结构一致的内容的观点:浮夸型和脆弱型自恋。然后,我们在一组本科生(n=238)中比较了这些维度的相似的效标网络与人格、人际行为和精神病理学指标的关系。总的来说,脆弱型和浮夸型自恋的效标网络是不相关的。目前的结果支持在概念化和评估层面上更明确地分析自恋结构的必要性。