• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对在单一中心接受胰十二指肠切除术的 294 例患者,根据国际胰腺瘘研究小组的胰腺瘘分类方案进行的胰腺瘘分析。

Analysis of pancreatic fistula according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula classification scheme for 294 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in a single center.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2011 Mar;40(2):222-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181f82f3c.

DOI:10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181f82f3c
PMID:21206332
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to validate the value of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme for pancreatic fistula (PF) and to identify predictive factors for clinically significant PF.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2007, 294 consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in a single medical center. Pancreatic fistula was evaluated by the ISGPF criteria and Johns Hopkins Hospital's definition (JHH). Then, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for PF development. Our own management strategies with PF were also discussed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PF was 19.4% (57/294) according to the ISGPF criteria, and 8.8% (26/294) using the JHH definition. Thirty-one patients with PF classified by the ISGPF were missed by the JHH definition. By logistic regression analysis, we found that besides the lack of cardiovascular disease and malignant diseases, our single-layer continuous circular invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy was another independent factor for the lowered incidence of PF.

CONCLUSIONS

The ISGPF classification scheme was accurate for evaluating PF. Single-layer continuous circular invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy may be a promising method that may have been responsible for the lower incidence of PF in this study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证国际胰腺瘘研究组(ISGPF)胰腺瘘(PF)分类方案的价值,并确定预测临床显著 PF 的因素。

方法

2000 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月,在一家医疗中心连续对 294 例患者进行胰十二指肠切除术。根据 ISGPF 标准和约翰霍普金斯医院的定义(JHH)评估胰腺瘘。然后,进行逻辑回归分析以确定 PF 发生的预测因素。还讨论了我们自己对 PF 的管理策略。

结果

根据 ISGPF 标准,PF 的总发生率为 19.4%(57/294),根据 JHH 定义为 8.8%(26/294)。JHH 定义漏诊了 ISGPF 分类的 31 例 PF 患者。通过逻辑回归分析,我们发现,除了没有心血管疾病和恶性疾病外,我们的单层连续圆形内陷式胰肠吻合术也是 PF 发生率降低的另一个独立因素。

结论

ISGPF 分类方案可准确评估 PF。单层连续圆形内陷式胰肠吻合术可能是一种有前途的方法,这可能是本研究中 PF 发生率较低的原因。

相似文献

1
Analysis of pancreatic fistula according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula classification scheme for 294 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in a single center.对在单一中心接受胰十二指肠切除术的 294 例患者,根据国际胰腺瘘研究小组的胰腺瘘分类方案进行的胰腺瘘分析。
Pancreas. 2011 Mar;40(2):222-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181f82f3c.
2
Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors.胰十二指肠切除术后危及生命的胰瘘(C级):发病率、预后及危险因素
Am J Surg. 2009 Jun;197(6):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
3
Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: diagnosed according to International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition.胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘:根据国际胰瘘研究组(ISGPF)的定义进行诊断。
Pancreatology. 2007;7(4):325-31. doi: 10.1159/000105498. Epub 2007 Jul 11.
4
Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy - patients with low drain amylase level on postoperative day 1 are safe from developing pancreatic fistula.胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘的危险因素——术后第1天引流淀粉酶水平低的患者发生胰瘘的风险较低。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Nov-Dec;59(120):2657-60. doi: 10.5754/hge12098.
5
Clinically relevant pancreas-related infectious complication after pancreaticoenteral anastomosis could be predicted by the parameters obtained on postoperative day 3.术后第 3 天获得的参数可预测胰肠吻合术后与胰腺相关的临床相关感染性并发症。
Pancreas. 2012 Aug;41(6):916-21. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31823e7705.
6
Risk scoring system and predictor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术后临床相关胰瘘的风险评分系统及预测因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 21;21(19):5926-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5926.
7
Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial.胰十二指肠切除术后胰空肠吻合术的类型会降低胰瘘发生率吗?一项随机、前瞻性、双机构试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 May;208(5):738-47; discussion 747-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.031.
8
Reliability of continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术后胰肠吻合连续缝合的可靠性
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Nov-Dec;58(112):2132-9. doi: 10.5754/hge10314.
9
Body mass index is a risk factor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.体重指数是胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘的一个危险因素。
Am Surg. 2012 Feb;78(2):190-4.
10
Risk factor for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy performed by a surgeon during a learning curve: analysis of a single surgeon's experiences of 100 consecutive patients.处于学习曲线阶段的外科医生行胰十二指肠切除术后发生胰瘘的危险因素:对一位外科医生连续100例患者手术经验的分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Sep;59(118):1990-3. doi: 10.5754/hge11821.

引用本文的文献

1
Drain Amylase or Lipase for the Detection of POPF-Adding Evidence to an Ongoing Discussion.引流淀粉酶或脂肪酶用于胰瘘的检测——为正在进行的讨论增添证据
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):7. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010007.
2
[A single-team experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in 1010 cases].[单团队1010例机器人胰腺手术经验]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Feb 20;38(2):130-134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.02.02.
3
Advantages and Disadvantages of Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage in Distal Pancreatectomy.胰体尾切除术预防性腹腔引流的利弊
World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1226-35. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3399-4.
4
A Simple Method to Evaluate Whether Pancreas Texture Can Be Used to Predict Pancreatic Fistula Risk After Pancreatoduodenectomy.一种评估胰腺质地是否可用于预测胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘风险的简单方法。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Sep;19(9):1625-31. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2855-7. Epub 2015 May 16.
5
Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放胰十二指肠切除术:一项前瞻性、匹配的中期随访研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3698-711. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4140-y. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
6
Is routine drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy?胰十二指肠切除术后常规引流是否必要?
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 7;20(25):8110-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8110.
7
250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility.250 例机器人胰腺切除术:安全性和可行性。
Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):554-9; discussion 559-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e87c.
8
Rate of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤术后具有临床意义的胰瘘发生率
World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1517-26. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1598-9.
9
Comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression for detection of obesity.人工神经网络与逻辑回归在肥胖检测中的比较。
J Med Syst. 2012 Aug;36(4):2449-54. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9711-4. Epub 2011 May 10.