• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Escitalopram Versus Citalopram and Sertraline: A Double-Blind Controlled, Multi-centric Trial in Indian Patients with Unipolar Major Depression.依他普仑与西酞普兰和舍曲林治疗单相重性抑郁障碍的多中心、双盲对照研究。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;46(4):333-41.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study in adult outpatients.艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效及耐受性:一项针对成年门诊患者的为期6周的多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、活性药物对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2319-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.014.
3
Escitalopram versus sertraline in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial.艾司西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗重度抑郁症的随机临床试验
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Feb;23(2):245-50. doi: 10.1185/030079906X167273.
4
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.重度抑郁症的新型强化治疗策略
Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).
5
A randomized, double-blind, 24-week study of escitalopram (10 mg/day) versus citalopram (20 mg/day) in primary care patients with major depressive disorder.一项针对患有重度抑郁症的初级保健患者的随机、双盲、为期24周的研究,比较艾司西酞普兰(10毫克/天)与西酞普兰(20毫克/天)的疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Oct;21(10):1659-68. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65484.
6
Sertraline versus escitalopram in South Asians with moderate to severe major depressive disorder: (SOUTH-DEP) a double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial.舍曲林与艾司西酞普兰治疗南亚中度至重度重度抑郁症的疗效比较:(SOUTH-DEP)一项双盲、平行、随机对照试验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 5;85(10):4851-4859. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001185. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Open-label treatment with desvenlafaxine in postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder not responding to acute treatment with desvenlafaxine or escitalopram.在对急性治疗未能应答的绝经后女性抑郁症患者中进行的安非他酮开放性治疗。
CNS Drugs. 2011 Mar;25(3):227-38. doi: 10.2165/11586460-000000000-00000.
8
Ziprasidone Augmentation of Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Efficacy Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.齐拉西酮增强艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的疗效结果
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;172(12):1251-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14101251. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus citalopram: a double-blind, randomized study in patients with major depressive disorder. Nordic Antidepressant Study Group.米氮平与西酞普兰的疗效及耐受性:一项针对重度抑郁症患者的双盲、随机研究。北欧抗抑郁药研究小组
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Nov;14(6):329-37. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199911000-00002.
10
The safety and efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline in post-stroke depression: a randomized controlled trial.依西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗脑卒中后抑郁的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 15;24(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05833-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing treatment for depression in primary care using psychotherapy versus antidepressant medication in a low-resource setting: protocol for the OptimizeD randomized controlled trial.在资源匮乏环境下使用心理治疗与抗抑郁药物优化初级保健中抑郁症的治疗:优化随机对照试验方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07030-9.
2
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors within Cells: Temporal Resolution in Cytoplasm, Endoplasmic Reticulum, and Membrane.细胞内的选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂:细胞质、内质网和膜中的时间分辨率。
J Neurosci. 2023 Mar 29;43(13):2222-2241. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1519-22.2022. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Double blind, randomised trial to compare efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram for interferon induced depression in hepatitis C patients.一项比较艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰治疗丙型肝炎患者干扰素所致抑郁症疗效的双盲随机试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jul 19;19:100622. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100622. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials of treatment of depression from India.对印度抑郁症治疗试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;56(1):29-38. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.124711.
5
Escitalopram for the management of major depressive disorder: a review of its efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability.艾司西酞普兰用于治疗重度抑郁症:对其疗效、安全性及患者可接受性的综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:853-61. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S22495. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
6
Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.西酞普兰与其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2.
7
Research on antidepressants in India.印度抗抑郁药研究。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;52(Suppl 1):S341-54. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.69263.
8
Escitalopram: a review of its use in the management of major depressive disorder in adults.依他普仑:在成人重度抑郁症管理中的应用评价。
CNS Drugs. 2010 Sep;24(9):769-96. doi: 10.2165/11204760-000000000-00000.
9
Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study.西酞普兰与西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性:一项为期 6 周、多中心、随机、双盲、剂量灵活的研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Feb;213(2-3):639-46. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1822-y. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
10
Is escitalopram really relevantly superior to citalopram in treatment of major depressive disorder? A meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized trials.在治疗重度抑郁症方面,艾司西酞普兰真的比西酞普兰有显著优势吗?一项头对头随机试验的荟萃分析。
Croat Med J. 2010 Feb;51(1):61-73. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.61.

本文引用的文献

1
Escitalopram versus citalopram: the surprising role of the R-enantiomer.艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰对比:R-对映体的惊人作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Jul;174(2):163-76. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1865-z.
2
[Escitalopram is more effective than citalopram for the treatment of severe major depressive disorder].艾司西酞普兰在治疗重度重度抑郁症方面比西酞普兰更有效。
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):158-66. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95427-9.
3
Second-generation SSRIs: human monoamine transporter binding profile of escitalopram and R-fluoxetine.第二代选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂:艾司西酞普兰和R-氟西汀对人体单胺转运体的结合情况
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Sep 1;50(5):345-50. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01145-3.
4
Escitalopram (S-enantiomer of citalopram): clinical efficacy and onset of action predicted from a rat model.艾司西酞普兰(西酞普兰的S-对映体):基于大鼠模型预测的临床疗效及起效时间
Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001 May;88(5):282-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0773.2001.d01-118.x.
5
Citalopram therapy for depression: a review of 10 years of European experience and data from U.S. clinical trials.西酞普兰治疗抑郁症:欧洲十年经验及美国临床试验数据综述
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;61(12):896-908.
6
Chiral switches.手性转换
Lancet. 2000 Mar 25;355(9209):1085-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02047-X.
7
Clinical development of citalopram.西酞普兰的临床开发。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Oct;19(5 Suppl 1):36S-46S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199910001-00004.
8
Drug chirality and its clinical significance.药物的手性及其临床意义。
Drugs. 1996;52 Suppl 5:1-12. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199600525-00003.
9
The pharmacological effect of citalopram residues in the (S)-(+)-enantiomer.西酞普兰残留的(S)-(+)-对映体的药理作用。
J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1992;88(2):157-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01244820.

依他普仑与西酞普兰和舍曲林治疗单相重性抑郁障碍的多中心、双盲对照研究。

Escitalopram Versus Citalopram and Sertraline: A Double-Blind Controlled, Multi-centric Trial in Indian Patients with Unipolar Major Depression.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, Torrent Research Centre, Village Bhat, Dist. Gandhinagar-382 428.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;46(4):333-41.

PMID:21206792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2950952/
Abstract

The present randomized, double blind, parallel group, controlled, multi-centric trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram in comparison with citalopram and sertraline in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Outpatients (N=214) with an ongoing/newly diagnosed ICD-10 major depressive episode and a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score of > 18 were randomly assigned to citalopram, 20-40 mg/day (74 patients), escitalopram, 10-20 mg/day (69 patients) and sertraline, 50-150 mg/day (71 patients), for a 4-week double-blind treatment period, with dosage adjustment (after 2 weeks of treatment) according to the response to treatment. Clinical response was evaluated by the 17 items HAM-D and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales, which were recorded at baseline and at weekly intervals. Tolerability was evaluated by observed/spontaneously reported adverse changes in laboratory parameters (baseline and after 4 weeks). Response rate was defined as a decrease in HAM-D score by 50% from baseline and remission rate was defined as a HAM-D score of < 8. Response rate at the end of two week were 58% for escitalopram (10mg/day), 49% for citalopram (20mg/day) and 52% for sertraline (50-100mg/day). Response rate at the end of four week were 90% for escitalopram (10-20mg/day), 86% for citalopram (20-40mg/day) and 97% for sertraline (100-150mg/day). The Remission rates at the end of four weeks were 74% for escitalopram, 65% for citalopram and 77% for sertraline. Adverse experiences were reported by 45% of patients in escitalopram group, 58% patients in citalopram and 56% patients in the sertraline group. Additionally, there were lesser dropouts and lesser requirement for dose escalation in escitalopram than in citalopram and sertraline group. In conclusion Escitalopram, the Senantiomer of the citalopram is a safe and effective antidepressant in the Indian population. It has potentially superior efficacy than citalopram and a comparable efficacy to sertraline with fewer side effects than both citalopram and sertraline.

摘要

本随机、双盲、平行组、对照、多中心试验旨在评估艾司西酞普兰与西酞普兰和舍曲林相比在治疗重度抑郁症中的疗效和耐受性。入组患者(N=214)为正在进行/新诊断为 ICD-10 重度抑郁发作且汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)评分>18 的门诊患者,他们被随机分配至西酞普兰组(20-40mg/天,74 例)、艾司西酞普兰组(10-20mg/天,69 例)和舍曲林组(50-150mg/天,71 例),进行为期 4 周的双盲治疗,根据治疗反应调整剂量(治疗 2 周后)。临床反应通过 17 项 HAM-D 和临床总体印象(CGI)量表进行评估,基线和每周记录一次。耐受性通过观察/自发报告的实验室参数(基线和 4 周后)不良变化进行评估。反应率定义为 HAM-D 评分从基线下降 50%,缓解率定义为 HAM-D 评分<8。治疗 2 周时的反应率分别为艾司西酞普兰(10mg/天)58%、西酞普兰(20mg/天)49%和舍曲林(50-100mg/天)52%。治疗 4 周时的反应率分别为艾司西酞普兰(10-20mg/天)90%、西酞普兰(20-40mg/天)86%和舍曲林(100-150mg/天)97%。治疗 4 周时的缓解率分别为艾司西酞普兰 74%、西酞普兰 65%和舍曲林 77%。艾司西酞普兰组有 45%的患者报告出现不良反应,西酞普兰组有 58%的患者报告出现不良反应,舍曲林组有 56%的患者报告出现不良反应。此外,艾司西酞普兰组的脱落率和剂量递增需求均低于西酞普兰组和舍曲林组。总之,艾司西酞普兰(西酞普兰的 S-对映体)是印度人群中一种安全有效的抗抑郁药。它的疗效可能优于西酞普兰,与舍曲林相当,且不良反应比西酞普兰和舍曲林少。