Suppr超能文献

取决于颅底和脊髓脊索瘤切除范围的治疗结果。

The treatment outcome depending on the extent of resection in skull base and spinal chordomas.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Mar;153(3):509-16. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0928-7. Epub 2011 Jan 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The authors tried to assess the treatment outcomes depending on the extent of resection in axial chordomas and compare the outcome of two adjunctive therapies (external beam radiation therapy vs. stereotactic radiosurgery) following incomplete tumour resection in terms of local tumour control.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 30 consecutive patients with chordoma involving skull base, sacrum and mobile spine between 1993 and 2008. Their initial treatments had different extent of resection. Wide resection was performed for 12 (40%), subtotal resection and adjunctive radiotherapy/radiosurgery for 12 (40%), while six patients (20%) were solely treated with radiotherapy/radiosurgery. For these three groups, overall and progression-free survival rate were compared.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 96% at 5 years and 67% at 10 years. Tumour progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 73% and 43% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Local tumour progression was seen in 67% in all patients, 58% in wide resection group, 67% in subtotal resection plus radiotherapy/radiosurgery group, and 75% in radiotherapy/radiosurgery group; however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.69). Neither the extent of resection nor tumour location significantly influenced overall and progression-free survival (P > 0.05). With regard to the type of radiotherapy, tumour progression occurred in all lesions treated with external photon beam radiation therapy (EBRT) but only 38% of lesions treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive radiotherapy/radiosurgery following subtotal resection showed comparable local control and survival to wide resection. SRS offered superior local tumour control compared to EBRT.

摘要

目的

作者试图评估轴性脊索瘤的切除范围对治疗结果的影响,并比较两种辅助治疗(外照射放疗与立体定向放疗)在不完全肿瘤切除后的局部肿瘤控制效果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 1993 年至 2008 年间,30 例累及颅底、骶骨和活动脊柱的脊索瘤患者。他们的初始治疗有不同的切除范围。12 例(40%)行广泛切除术,12 例(40%)行次全切除术和辅助放疗/放疗,6 例(20%)仅行放疗/放疗。比较三组患者的总生存率和无进展生存率。

结果

5 年和 10 年总生存率分别为 96%和 67%。肿瘤无进展生存率(PFS)分别为 73%和 43%。所有患者的局部肿瘤进展率为 67%,广泛切除组为 58%,次全切除加放疗/放疗组为 67%,放疗/放疗组为 75%;但差异无统计学意义(P=0.69)。切除范围和肿瘤位置均不显著影响总生存率和无进展生存率(P>0.05)。对于放疗类型,外照射放疗(EBRT)治疗的所有病变均发生肿瘤进展,而立体定向放疗(SRS)治疗的病变仅 38%发生肿瘤进展(P=0.003)。

结论

次全切除术后辅助放疗/放疗的局部控制和生存效果与广泛切除相当。SRS 与 EBRT 相比,可提供更好的局部肿瘤控制效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验