Suppr超能文献

基于术后患者特定的计算机断层血管造影和超声流量数据的颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术后颈动脉的计算流体动力学。

Computational fluid dynamics of carotid arteries after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting based on postoperative patient-specific computed tomography angiography and ultrasound flow data.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;68(4):1096-101; discussion 1101. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318208f1a0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are significant differences in the postoperative morphological and hemodynamic conditions of the carotid arteries between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and endarterectomy (CEA).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the postoperative rheological conditions after CAS with those after CEA with patch angioplasty (patch CEA) through the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on patient-specific data.

METHODS

The rheological conditions in the carotid arteries were simulated in 2 patients after CAS and in 2 patients after patch CEA by CFD calculations. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the carotid arteries was performed with the images obtained with computed tomography angiography. The streamlines and wall shear stress (WSS) were calculated by a supercomputer. Adequate boundary conditions were determined by comparing the simulation results with ultrasound flow data.

RESULTS

CFD was successfully calculated for all patients. The differences between the flow velocities of ultrasound data and those of the simulation results were limited. In the streamline analysis, the maximum flow velocities in the internal carotid artery after patch CEA were around two-thirds of those after CAS. Rotational slow flow was observed in the internal carotid artery bulb after patch CEA. WSS analysis found regional low WSS near the outer wall of the bulb. High WSS was observed at the distal end of the arteriotomy after patch CEA and at the residual stenosis after CAS.

CONCLUSION

CFD of postoperative carotid arteries disclosed the differences in streamlines and WSS between CAS and patch CEA. CFD may allow us to obtain adequate rheological conditions conducive to achieving the best clinical results.

摘要

背景

颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)术后颈动脉的形态和血流动力学存在显著差异。

目的

通过基于患者特定数据的计算流体动力学(CFD)比较 CAS 后与补丁成形术(补丁 CEA)后颈动脉的术后流变条件。

方法

通过 CFD 计算,对 2 例 CAS 后和 2 例补丁 CEA 后患者的颈动脉血流动力学进行模拟。使用计算机断层血管造影术获得的图像对颈动脉进行三维重建。通过超级计算机计算流线和壁面剪切应力(WSS)。通过将模拟结果与超声流量数据进行比较,确定适当的边界条件。

结果

所有患者均成功进行了 CFD 计算。超声数据与模拟结果之间的流速差异有限。在流线分析中,补丁 CEA 后颈内动脉的最大流速约为 CAS 后的三分之二。补丁 CEA 后颈内动脉球部出现旋转缓慢的血流。WSS 分析发现球部外壁附近存在局部低 WSS。补丁 CEA 后动脉切开术的远端和 CAS 后残余狭窄处存在高 WSS。

结论

颈动脉术后 CFD 揭示了 CAS 与补丁 CEA 之间流线和 WSS 的差异。CFD 可能使我们能够获得有利于获得最佳临床效果的充分流变条件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验