Suppr超能文献

比较 21 基因复发评分检测和 Adjuvant! 在淋巴结阴性、ER 阳性乳腺癌患者中的预后和预测效用:来自 NSABP B-14 和 NSABP B-20 的结果。

Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20.

机构信息

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers, and Pathology Division, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 May;127(1):133-42. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1331-z. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

Abstract

The Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) is a validated genomic predictor of outcome and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancer. Adjuvant! was developed using SEER registry data and results from the Early Breast Cancer Clinical Trialists' overview analyses to estimate outcome and benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. In this report we compare the prognostic and predictive utility of these two tools in node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer. RS and Adjuvant! results were available from 668 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-14 patients, 227 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-20 patients, and 424 chemotherapy plus tamoxifen-treated B-20 patients. Adjuvant! results were also available from 1952 B-20 patients. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the prognostic and predictive utility of RS and Adjuvant!. Both RS (P < 0.001) and Adjuvant! (P = 0.002) provided strong independent prognostic information in tamoxifen-treated patients. Combining RS and individual clinicopathologic characteristics provided greater prognostic discrimination than combining RS and the composite Adjuvant!. In the B-20 cohort with RS results (n = 651), RS was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit (interaction P = 0.031 for DRFI, P = 0.011 for overall survival [OS], P = 0.082 for disease-free survival [DFS]), but Adjuvant! was not (interaction P = 0.99, P = 0.311, and P = 0.357, respectively). However, in the larger B-20 sub-cohort (n = 1952), Adjuvant! was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit for OS (interaction P = 0.009) but not for DRFI (P = 0.219) or DFS (P = 0.099). Prognostic estimates can be optimized by combining RS and clinicopathologic information instead of simply combining RS and Adjuvant!. RS should be used for estimating relative chemotherapy benefit.

摘要

Oncotype DX 复发评分 (RS) 是一种经过验证的预测 ER 阳性乳腺癌患者结局和辅助化疗反应的基因组预测因子。Adjuvant! 是使用 SEER 登记数据和早期乳腺癌临床试验者综述分析的结果开发的,用于估计辅助激素治疗和化疗的结局和获益。在本报告中,我们比较了这两种工具在淋巴结阴性、ER 阳性乳腺癌中的预后和预测效用。668 例接受他莫昔芬治疗的 NSABP B-14 患者、227 例接受他莫昔芬治疗的 NSABP B-20 患者和 424 例接受化疗加他莫昔芬治疗的 B-20 患者的 RS 和 Adjuvant! 结果可用。B-20 患者的 1952 例也有 Adjuvant! 结果。主要终点是远处无复发生存期 (DRFI)。Cox 比例风险模型用于比较 RS 和 Adjuvant! 的预后和预测效用。RS(P<0.001)和 Adjuvant!(P=0.002)在接受他莫昔芬治疗的患者中均提供了强有力的独立预后信息。将 RS 与个体临床病理特征相结合提供了比将 RS 与综合 Adjuvant! 相结合更好的预后区分能力。在具有 RS 结果的 B-20 队列中(n=651),RS 对化疗获益具有显著的预测作用(DRFI 的交互作用 P=0.031,OS 的交互作用 P=0.011,DFS 的交互作用 P=0.082),但 Adjuvant! 没有(交互作用 P=0.99,P=0.311 和 P=0.357)。然而,在更大的 B-20 亚队列(n=1952)中,Adjuvant! 对 OS 的化疗获益具有显著的预测作用(交互作用 P=0.009),但对 DRFI(P=0.219)或 DFS(P=0.099)没有预测作用。通过将 RS 与临床病理信息相结合而不是简单地将 RS 与 Adjuvant! 相结合,可以优化预后估计。RS 应该用于估计相对化疗获益。

相似文献

4
Findings from recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies in stage I breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001(30):62-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003463.
7
Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 10;24(23):3726-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985. Epub 2006 May 23.

引用本文的文献

2
Prediction of breast cancer Invasive Disease Events using transfer learning on clinical data as image-form.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0312036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312036. eCollection 2024.
4
Targeting the Oxytocin Receptor for Breast Cancer Management: A Niche for Peptide Tracers.
J Med Chem. 2024 Feb 8;67(3):1625-1640. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01089. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
6
MCM-2 Levels as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients According to TAILORx Classification.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Sep 1;15:659-669. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S421535. eCollection 2023.
7
Cost-utility analysis of genomic profiling in early breast cancer in Colombia.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jul 10;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00449-5.
9
The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Genomic Assays in Guiding Adjuvant Breast Radiation Therapy.
Biomedicines. 2022 Dec 30;11(1):98. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11010098.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Oncotype DX from a Brazilian private medicine perspective: a GBECAM multicenter retrospective study.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Dec 26;14:17588359221141760. doi: 10.1177/17588359221141760. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

3
Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):736-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp082. Epub 2009 May 12.
4
Ki67 expression and docetaxel efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2809-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2808. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5287-312. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2364. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
8
Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 10;24(23):3726-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985. Epub 2006 May 23.
9
Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 10;24(11):1665-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9115. Epub 2006 Feb 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验