Suppr超能文献

淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的复发风险和化疗获益:仅复发评分与病理和临床因素相结合。

Risk of recurrence and chemotherapy benefit for patients with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: recurrence score alone and integrated with pathologic and clinical factors.

机构信息

National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 20;29(33):4365-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.3714. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The 21-gene breast cancer assay recurrence score (RS) is widely used for assessing recurrence risk and predicting chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive breast cancer. Pathologic and clinical factors such as tumor size, grade, and patient age also provide independent prognostic utility. We developed a formal integration of these measures and evaluated its prognostic and predictive value.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) B-14 and translational research cohort of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (TransATAC) studies, we included patients who received hormonal monotherapy, had ER-positive tumors, and RS and traditional clinicopathologic factors assessed (647 and 1,088, respectively). Individual patient risk assessments from separate Cox models were combined using meta-analysis to form an RS-pathology-clinical (RSPC) assessment of distant recurrence risk. Risk assessments by RS and RSPC were compared in node-negative (N0) patients. RSPC was compared with RS for predicting chemotherapy benefit in NSABP B-20.

RESULTS

RSPC had significantly more prognostic value for distant recurrence than did RS (P < .001) and showed better separation of risk in the study population. RSPC classified fewer patients as intermediate risk (17.8% v 26.7%, P < .001) and more patients as lower risk (63.8% v 54.2%, P < .001) than did RS among 1,444 N0 ER-positive patients. In B-20, the interaction of RSPC with chemotherapy was not statistically significant (P = .10), in contrast to the previously reported significant interaction of RS with chemotherapy (P = .037).

CONCLUSION

RSPC refines the assessment of distant recurrence risk and reduces the number of patients classified as intermediate risk. Adding clinicopathologic measures did not seem to enhance the value of RS alone nor the individual biology RS identifies in predicting chemotherapy benefit.

摘要

目的

21 基因乳腺癌检测复发评分(RS)广泛用于评估雌激素受体(ER)阳性乳腺癌患者的复发风险和预测化疗获益。肿瘤大小、分级和患者年龄等病理和临床因素也提供了独立的预后效用。我们对这些指标进行了正式整合,并评估了其预后和预测价值。

患者和方法

从全国外科辅助乳腺和肠道(NSABP)B-14 和阿那曲唑、他莫昔芬单独或联合的转化研究队列(TransATAC)中,我们纳入了接受激素单药治疗、ER 阳性肿瘤且 RS 和传统临床病理因素评估的患者(分别为 647 例和 1088 例)。分别采用 Cox 模型对单个患者的风险评估进行组合,采用 meta 分析进行合并,形成远处复发风险的 RS-病理-临床(RSPC)评估。在淋巴结阴性(N0)患者中比较 RS 和 RSPC 的风险评估。在 NSABP B-20 中比较 RSPC 与 RS 预测化疗获益。

结果

RSPC 对远处复发的预后价值明显优于 RS(P <.001),并在研究人群中更好地分离了风险。与 RS 相比,RSPC 将更少的患者分类为中危(17.8%比 26.7%,P <.001),更多的患者分类为低危(63.8%比 54.2%,P <.001),在 1444 例 N0 ER 阳性患者中。在 B-20 中,RSPC 与化疗的相互作用无统计学意义(P =.10),而之前报道的 RS 与化疗的显著相互作用(P =.037)。

结论

RSPC 细化了远处复发风险的评估,并减少了被归类为中危的患者数量。添加临床病理指标似乎并没有增强 RS 单独或其识别的个体生物学在预测化疗获益方面的价值。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus Values and Weighting Factors.共识值与加权因子。
J Res Natl Bur Stand (1977). 1982 Sep-Oct;87(5):377-385. doi: 10.6028/jres.087.022.
8
Evaluating the predictiveness of a continuous marker.评估连续标志物的预测性。
Biometrics. 2007 Dec;63(4):1181-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00814.x. Epub 2007 May 8.
9
Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update.临床试验荟萃分析的随机效应模型:最新进展
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):105-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 May 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验