Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, 500 W. 120th St., Room 200 Mudd, MC 4701, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Pharm Res. 2011 May;28(5):1041-8. doi: 10.1007/s11095-010-0350-0. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
To determine the optimal measurement strategy for fingerprinting condensed phases of pharmaceutical systems using atomic pair distribution functions (PDFs) obtained from data collected using several types of x-ray diffraction instruments.
PDFs of crystalline and amorphous-phase molecular systems derived from data accessible to copper-, molybdenum-, and silver-anode laboratory sources were compared to one another and synchrotron data using qualitative and quantitative methods.
We find that reliable fingerprinting is still possible using silver and molybdenum laboratory sources, but data from copper anode laboratory sources are unreliable for fingerprinting, yielding ambiguous and potentially incorrect results.
The ambiguities make data measured using low energy x-rays unsuitable for fingerprinting active pharmaceutical ingredients and small molecule systems, and, in general, copper anode diffractometers are undesirable for this purpose; however, laboratory x-ray sources with either Mo or Ag anodes are well suited for this application.
确定使用原子对分布函数(PDF)从使用多种类型的 X 射线衍射仪器收集的数据来对药物系统的凝聚相进行指纹识别的最佳测量策略。
使用铜、钼和银阳极实验室源获得的可访问数据来比较结晶相和非晶相分子系统的 PDF,并使用定性和定量方法与同步加速器数据进行比较。
我们发现,使用银和钼实验室源仍然可以进行可靠的指纹识别,但铜阳极实验室源的数据用于指纹识别不可靠,会产生模糊且可能不正确的结果。
这些不确定性使得使用低能 X 射线测量的数据不适合用于识别活性药物成分和小分子系统的指纹,通常情况下,铜阳极衍射仪不适用于此目的;然而,具有 Mo 或 Ag 阳极的实验室 X 射线源非常适合此应用。