Tsekouras N, Avgerinos E D, Moulakakis K, Papasideris C, Giannakopoulos T, Liapis C D
Department of Vascular Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2011 Feb;52(1):47-51.
During the last 50 years vascular surgery has met an enormous evolution, paving the way for the development of modern vascular and endovascular surgery. Although, vascular surgery (VS) has emerged from general (GS) and cardiothoracic surgery (CTS), the need for specialized training has been recognized and gradually practice patterns are shifting towards vascular independence, but yet not in all countries. In these countries VS training is either permitted only after prerequisite GS certification, or as a non accredited surgical specialty, VS might be included in GS or CTS training and certification. Such a policy raises two main issues: the efficiency of vascular training within the GS or CTS curricula and the performance of vascular interventions by general or cardiothoracic surgeons. Meanwhile, the explosion of endovascular procedures has brought new disciplines into play, each one wanting to maintain its stake in the future. Interventional radiologists and a significant number of cardiologists become increasingly involved in the treatment of vascular diseases. The question of which specialist among those qualified should carry out medical treatment, open, and endovascular procedures is still suspended. Under this prism, vascular training issues arise as an important component of the future of vascular surgeons.
在过去的50年里,血管外科经历了巨大的发展,为现代血管和腔内血管外科的发展铺平了道路。尽管血管外科(VS)是从普通外科(GS)和心胸外科(CTS)中发展而来的,但对专业培训的需求已得到认可,并且实践模式正逐渐向血管独立转变,但并非在所有国家都是如此。在这些国家,要么仅在取得GS认证的先决条件后才允许进行VS培训,要么作为一个未经认可的外科专业,VS可能被纳入GS或CTS培训及认证中。这样的政策引发了两个主要问题:GS或CTS课程中血管培训的效率,以及普通外科或心胸外科医生进行血管介入手术的表现。与此同时,腔内血管手术的激增引入了新的学科,每个学科都希望在未来保持自己的份额。介入放射科医生和大量心脏病专家越来越多地参与血管疾病的治疗。在这些合格的专家中,应由哪一位来进行医疗、开放手术和腔内血管手术的问题仍悬而未决。在此背景下,血管培训问题成为血管外科医生未来发展的一个重要组成部分。