Fey Anne, Levine Lionel, Wilson David B
Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Sep;82(3 Pt 1):031121. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.031121. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
A popular theory of self-organized criticality predicts that the stationary density of the Abelian sandpile model equals the threshold density of the corresponding fixed-energy sandpile. We recently announced that this "density conjecture" is false when the underlying graph is any of Z2, the complete graph K(n), the Cayley tree, the ladder graph, the bracelet graph, or the flower graph. In this paper, we substantiate this claim by rigorous proof and extensive simulations. We show that driven-dissipative sandpiles continue to evolve even after a constant fraction of the sand has been lost at the sink. Nevertheless, we do find (and prove) a relationship between the two models: the threshold density of the fixed-energy sandpile is the point at which the driven-dissipative sandpile begins to lose a macroscopic amount of sand to the sink.
一个关于自组织临界性的流行理论预测,阿贝尔沙堆模型的稳态密度等于相应固定能量沙堆的阈值密度。我们最近宣布,当基础图为Z2、完全图K(n)、凯莱树、梯图、手镯图或花图中的任何一种时,这个“密度猜想”是错误的。在本文中,我们通过严格的证明和广泛的模拟来证实这一说法。我们表明,即使在汇点处有固定比例的沙子流失后,驱动耗散沙堆仍会继续演化。然而,我们确实发现(并证明)了这两个模型之间的一种关系:固定能量沙堆的阈值密度是驱动耗散沙堆开始向汇点流失宏观数量沙子的点。