Hye R J, Mitchell A T, Dory C E, Freischlag J A, Roberts A C
Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, Calif.
Arch Surg. 1990 Dec;125(12):1550-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410240028005.
To establish whether a transition from surgical to percutaneous placement of Greenfield filters was justified, a review of the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of the two approaches was conducted. Between 1984 and 1989, 168 filters were placed in 169 patients, 48 surgically and 120 percutaneously. Placement was successful in 45 (94%) of the 48 surgical patients and 120 (99%) of the 121 percutaneous patients. Filter misplacement occurred in three (6%) surgical patients and no percutaneous patients. Clinically evident femoral vein thrombosis occurred in only four (5%) of the percutaneous patients, while inferior vena cava thrombosis occurred in three (3%) of the percutaneous patients. One pulmonary embolus occurred after percutaneous filter placement and resulted in death. The cost of percutaneous placement was 58% that of surgical placement. A retrospective review of the experience in our patient population indicates that safety, cost, and ease of insertion make the percutaneous approach the procedure of choice for Greenfield filter placement.
为确定从手术放置格林菲尔德滤器过渡到经皮放置是否合理,对两种方法的安全性、有效性和成本效益进行了回顾。1984年至1989年间,169例患者放置了168个滤器,其中48例通过手术放置,120例经皮放置。48例手术患者中有45例(94%)放置成功,121例经皮患者中有120例(99%)放置成功。3例(6%)手术患者出现滤器误置,经皮患者未出现。仅4例(5%)经皮患者发生临床明显的股静脉血栓形成,3例(3%)经皮患者发生下腔静脉血栓形成。1例经皮放置滤器后发生肺栓塞并导致死亡。经皮放置的成本是手术放置的58%。对我们患者群体经验的回顾表明,安全性、成本和插入的简便性使经皮方法成为格林菲尔德滤器放置的首选方法。