Pesola G R, Hogg J E, Eissa N, Matthews D E, Carlon G C
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.
Crit Care Med. 1990 Dec;18(12):1378-82. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199012000-00014.
Hypertonic NG tube feeding in hospitalized patients, whether on the hospital ward or in the ICU, is considered a common etiology of diarrhea. To evaluate the accuracy of this assumption, five normal volunteers, ten hospitalized postoperative patients with head and neck cancer, and 24 ICU patients were given hypertonic (690 mosm), low residue, lactose-free tube feedings starting at 30 kcal/kg.day. There was no prior history of diarrhea in any of the groups studied. There was a significant difference in albumin levels between the three groups, with an average albumin of 2.8 g/dl in the ICU patient group; different from 4.5 g/dl present in both the normal volunteer and non-ICU hospitalized patient groups (general linear models procedure from SAS, p less than .05) (Duncan test). Diarrhea was not present in the normal volunteers or non-ICU patients during the feedings, but did occur in 3/24 ICU patients. This difference was not significant. The three patients with diarrhea had an average albumin level of 3.0 g/dl, while the other ICU patients had an average albumin of 2.7 g/dl. We conclude that hypertonic NG tube feedings do not cause diarrhea in normal volunteers or postoperative head and neck cancer patients. However, in a small statistically insignificant percent of mechanically ventilated ICU patients, this regimen may cause diarrhea although no risk factors can be identified.
在住院患者中,无论是在医院病房还是在重症监护病房(ICU),经鼻胃管给予高渗性喂养被认为是腹泻的常见病因。为评估这一假设的准确性,对5名正常志愿者、10名头颈癌术后住院患者以及24名ICU患者开始给予高渗(690毫渗量浓度)、低渣、无乳糖的管饲,起始量为30千卡/千克·天。所研究的任何组中均无腹泻既往史。三组之间白蛋白水平存在显著差异,ICU患者组白蛋白平均为2.8克/分升;不同于正常志愿者组和非ICU住院患者组的4.5克/分升(采用SAS的一般线性模型程序,p<0.05)(邓肯检验)。在喂养期间,正常志愿者和非ICU患者未出现腹泻,但24名ICU患者中有3人出现腹泻。这种差异不显著。3例腹泻患者的白蛋白平均水平为3.0克/分升,而其他ICU患者白蛋白平均为2.7克/分升。我们得出结论,高渗经鼻胃管喂养不会在正常志愿者或头颈癌术后患者中引起腹泻。然而,在一小部分机械通气的ICU患者中,尽管无法确定危险因素,但这种喂养方案可能会导致腹泻,且在统计学上无显著差异。