James Thomson and Johanne Brunet are at the Dept of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Jan;5(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(90)90006-Y.
Over the last decade, new hypotheses have been proposed for the evolution of dioecy in plants. Most of the selective mechanisms invoked have been suggested and supported by phylogenetic correlations. Here we review (1) the validity of the correlations (especially in light of recent critiques of the comparative method), and (2) the conformity of the proposed mechanisms to empirical data. None of the hypotheses can be flatly rejected on existing evidence, but the strength of their support varies. Future correlational studies must explicitly consider phylogeny; more importantly, such broad studies should also be supplemented by detailed studies of particular transitions to dioecy (e.g. within genera) - studies of the sort that have clarified analogous issues such as heterostyly.
在过去的十年中,人们提出了植物雌雄异株进化的新假说。大多数被援引的选择机制都是通过系统发育相关性来提出和支持的。在这里,我们回顾了(1)相关性的有效性(特别是考虑到最近对比较方法的批评),以及(2)提出的机制与经验数据的一致性。在现有证据下,没有一个假说可以被断然否定,但它们的支持力度有所不同。未来的相关性研究必须明确考虑到系统发育;更重要的是,这种广泛的研究也应该辅以对特定雌雄异株过渡(例如在属内)的详细研究——这些研究已经澄清了类似的问题,例如异型花柱。