Program for HIV Prevention and Treatment (IRD URI 174), Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Ther Drug Monit. 2011 Feb;33(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3182057f6f.
Indinavir boosted with ritonavir (IDV/r) dosing with 400/100 mg, twice daily, is preferred in Thai adults, but this dose can lead to concentrations close to the boundaries of its therapeutic window. The objectives of this analysis were to validate a population pharmacokinetic model to describe IDV/r concentrations in HIV-infected Thai patients and to investigate the impact of patient characteristics on achieving adequate IDV concentrations. IDV/r concentration data from 513 plasma samples were available. Population means and variances of pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a nonlinear mixed effects regression model (NONMEM Version VI). Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of achieving IDV concentrations within its therapeutic window. IDV/r pharmacokinetics were best described by a one-compartment model coupled with a single transit compartment absorption model. Body weight influenced indinavir apparent oral clearance and volume of distribution and allometric scaling significantly reduced the interindividual variability. Final population estimates (interindividual variability in percentage) of indinavir apparent oral clearance and volume of distribution were 21.3 L/h/70 kg (30%) and 90.7 L/70 kg (22%), respectively. Based on model simulations, the probability of achieving an IDV trough concentration greater than 0.1 mg/L was greater than 99% for 600/100 mg and greater than 98% for 400/100 mg, twice daily, in patients weighing 40 to 80 kg. However, the probability of achieving IDV concentrations associated with an increased risk of drug toxicity (greater than 10.0 mg/L) increased from 1% to 10% with 600/100 mg compared with less than 1% with 400/100 mg when body weight decreased from 80 to 40 kg. The validated model developed predicts that 400/100 mg of IDV/r, twice daily, provides indinavir concentrations within the recommended therapeutic window for the majority of patients. The risk of toxic drug concentrations increases rapidly with IDV/r dose of 600/100 mg for patients less than 50 kg and therapeutic drug monitoring of IDV concentrations would help to reduce the risk of IDV-induced nephrotoxicity.
增效后的蛋白酶抑制剂茚地那韦(IDV/r),剂量为 400/100mg,每日两次,是泰国成年人的首选,但该剂量可能会导致药物浓度接近治疗窗的边界。本分析的目的是验证一种群体药代动力学模型,以描述感染 HIV 的泰国患者的 IDV/r 浓度,并探讨患者特征对实现足够 IDV 浓度的影响。有 513 个血浆样本的 IDV/r 浓度数据可用。使用非线性混合效应回归模型(NONMEM 版本 VI)估计药代动力学参数的群体平均值和方差。进行蒙特卡罗模拟以估计在治疗窗内达到 IDV 浓度的概率。IDV/r 药代动力学最好通过一个单室模型与一个单一转运室吸收模型相结合来描述。体重影响茚地那韦的表观口服清除率和分布容积,且比例缩放显著降低了个体间的变异性。茚地那韦表观口服清除率和分布容积的最终群体估计值(个体间变异性的百分比)分别为 21.3 L/h/70kg(30%)和 90.7 L/70kg(22%)。基于模型模拟,对于体重为 40 至 80kg 的患者,600/100mg 每日两次的方案使 IDV 谷浓度大于 0.1mg/L 的概率大于 99%,400/100mg 每日两次的方案使 IDV 谷浓度大于 0.1mg/L 的概率大于 98%。然而,与 400/100mg 每日两次的方案相比,当体重从 80kg 降至 40kg 时,600/100mg 每日两次的方案使与药物毒性增加相关的 IDV 浓度(大于 10.0mg/L)的概率从 1%增加到 10%。验证的模型预测,400/100mg 的 IDV/r,每日两次,可为大多数患者提供在推荐治疗窗内的茚地那韦浓度。对于体重小于 50kg 的患者,IDV/r 剂量为 600/100mg 时,药物浓度毒性的风险迅速增加,对 IDV 浓度进行治疗药物监测有助于降低 IDV 诱导的肾毒性风险。