Meredith-Owen William
Stratford-Upon-Avon, UK.
J Anal Psychol. 2011 Feb;56(1):56-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2010.01890.x.
This paper considers Winnicott's critique of Jung, principally expressed in his review of Memories, Dreams, Reflections, which asserts that Jung's creative contribution to analysis was constrained by his failure to integrate his 'primitive destructive impulses', subsequent to inadequate early containment. It is argued that although Winnicott's diagnosis illuminates Jung's shadow, particularly his constraints vis-à-vis the repressed Freudian unconscious, it fails to appreciate the efficacy of the compensatory containment Jung found in the collective unconscious. This enigmatic relationship between destruction and creativity-so central to late Winnicott-is illuminated by Matte Blanco's bi-logic, and further explored in relation to William Blake. Winnicott's personal resolution through his Jung-inspired 'splitting headache' dream of destruction-previously considered in this Journal by Morey (2005) and Sedgwick (2008)-is given particular attention.
本文探讨温尼科特对荣格的批评，主要体现在他对《回忆、梦、思考》的书评中。该批评称，荣格对精神分析的创造性贡献受到限制，原因是他在早期缺乏足够的容纳环境，未能整合其“原始破坏冲动”。有人认为，尽管温尼科特的诊断揭示了荣格的阴影，尤其是他相对于被压抑的弗洛伊德式无意识的局限，但它没有认识到荣格在集体无意识中找到的补偿性容纳的功效。破坏与创造力之间这种神秘的关系——这对晚期的温尼科特至关重要——由马泰·布兰科的双重逻辑所阐明，并结合威廉·布莱克作进一步探讨。温尼科特通过受荣格启发的“偏头痛性分裂”破坏之梦实现的个人解决方式——莫雷（2005年）和塞奇威克（2008年）此前在本刊对此已有论述——受到特别关注。
