• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison between US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and Medicare coverage.美国预防服务工作组建议与医疗保险覆盖范围的比较。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):44-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1194.
2
Health plan implementation of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force A and B recommendations--Colorado, 2010.美国预防服务工作组 A 和 B 级建议的健康计划实施情况——2010 年科罗拉多州。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Oct 7;60(39):1348-50.
3
The Utilization and Costs of Grade D USPSTF Services in Medicare, 2007-2016.2007-2016 年 Medicare 中 D 级 USPSTF 服务的利用情况和费用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3711-3718. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06784-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
4
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Methods to Communicate and Disseminate Clinical Preventive Services Recommendations.美国预防服务工作组交流和传播临床预防服务建议的方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1S1):S81-S87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.004.
5
Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Guidelines for and Against Clinical Preventive Services: Results from a National Survey.对支持和反对临床预防服务的循证指南的了解及态度:一项全国性调查的结果
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):51-76. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12181.
6
Preventive care in the emergency department, Part II: Clinical preventive services--an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group.急诊科的预防保健,第二部分:临床预防服务——一项基于循证医学的急诊医学综述。学术急诊医学协会公共卫生与教育特别工作组预防服务工作小组
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Sep;7(9):1042-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02098.x.
7
USPSTF perspective on evidence-based preventive recommendations for children.USPSTF 对儿童循证预防建议的观点。
Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):e399-407. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2087. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
8
Effectiveness of Medicare cost-sharing elimination for Cancer screening on utilization.医疗保险消除癌症筛查费用分担对利用率的有效性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4135-9.
9
Consistency and sources of divergence in recommendations on screening with questionnaires for presently experienced health problems or symptoms: a comparison of recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, UK National Screening Committee, and US Preventive Services Task Force.针对当前经历的健康问题或症状进行问卷调查筛查的建议中的一致性和分歧来源:加拿大预防性医疗保健工作组、英国国家筛查委员会和美国预防服务工作组建议的比较
BMC Med. 2017 Aug 9;15(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0903-8.
10
Screening and preventive services for older adults.老年人的筛查与预防服务。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;78(4):498-508. doi: 10.1002/msj.20275.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the Value of the Wellness Visit: A Descriptive Study.理解健康体检的价值:一项描述性研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Oct;61(4):591-595. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 May 2.
2
Addressing Pediatric Obesity in Ambulatory Care: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?解决门急诊儿童肥胖问题:我们在哪里,我们要去哪里?
Curr Obes Rep. 2016 Jun;5(2):214-40. doi: 10.1007/s13679-016-0210-2.
3
Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.结直肠癌筛查的医疗保险费用:CT结肠成像与光学结肠镜检查对比
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):2966-76. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0538-1.
4
Management of falls in community-dwelling older adults: clinical guidance statement from the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association.社区居住老年人跌倒的管理:美国物理治疗协会老年物理治疗学会的临床指导声明
Phys Ther. 2015 Jun;95(6):815-34. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140415. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
5
Residency and specialties training in nutrition: a call for action.住院医师规范化培训和专科医师培训中的营养问题:行动呼吁。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 May;99(5 Suppl):1174S-83S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.073528. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
6
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and cancer screening among female Medicare beneficiaries.美国预防服务工作组的建议与女性 Medicare 受益人的癌症筛查
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Mar;23(3):211-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4421. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
7
Clinical and community delivery systems for preventive care: an integration framework.预防保健的临床和社区提供系统:整合框架。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Oct;45(4):508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.008.
8
Eligibility criteria in private and public coverage policies for BRCA genetic testing and genetic counseling.BRCA 基因检测和遗传咨询的私人和公共保险政策中的资格标准。
Genet Med. 2011 Dec;13(12):1045-50. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31822a8113.
9
In this issue: clinical decision support.本期内容:临床决策支持。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):2. doi: 10.1370/afm.1215.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the delivery of preventive services to Medicare beneficiaries.改善向医疗保险受益人提供预防性服务的情况。
JAMA. 2009 Dec 23;302(24):2699-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1918.
2
Use and knowledge of the new enrollee "welcome to Medicare" physical examination benefit.新参保人“欢迎加入医疗保险”体检福利的使用及相关知识。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2009 Spring;30(3):71-6.
3
Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.前列腺特异性抗原筛查前列腺癌的利弊:美国预防服务工作组的证据更新
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):192-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00009.
4
Use and costs of nonrecommended tests during routine preventive health exams.常规预防性健康检查期间非推荐检查的使用情况及费用
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jun;30(6):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.02.003.
5
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.美国国家高血压预防、检测、评估与治疗联合委员会第七次报告:JNC 7报告。
JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2560-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560. Epub 2003 May 14.
6
Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?初级保健:有足够的时间用于预防吗?
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.635.
7
Disease prevention policy under Medicare: a historical and political analysis.医疗保险下的疾病预防政策:历史与政治分析
Am J Prev Med. 1993 Mar-Apr;9(2):71-7.

美国预防服务工作组建议与医疗保险覆盖范围的比较。

Comparison between US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and Medicare coverage.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):44-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1194.

DOI:10.1370/afm.1194
PMID:21242560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3022045/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is authorized by the US government to review and disseminate the scientific evidence for clinical preventive services. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the alignment of Medicare preventive services coverage with the recommendations of the USPSTF before implementation of health reform.

METHODS

We recorded all Medicare coverage for preventive services as listed in the Medicare preventive services guide of 2007 (including the 2009 update) for all recommended (A-or B-rated) USPSTF and not recommended (D-rated) guidelines for preventive screening and counseling in adults aged 65 years and older. We analyzed 2 components of preventive care: preventive coordination (risk assessment, patient motivation, and arranging of preventive service) and the preventive service itself. The main outcome measure was the percentage of agreement between USPSTF recommendations and Medicare coverage.

RESULTS

The USPSTF recommended 15 preventive interventions for adults aged 65 years and older. Although Medicare partially reimbursed 93% of recommended services, full reimbursement for the preventive coordination, as well as the service, was available for only 7% of these services. This partial coverage is available mostly as part of the Welcome to Medicare Visit. Further, the USPSTF recommended against 16 preventive services; Medicare reimbursed clinicians for 44% of these services.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare coverage for preventive services needs to be reassessed, with special focus on preventive coordination. Continuing previous practices will likely promote both inadequate and excessive delivery of preventive services. The new health care reform law has the potential to improve the provision of preventive services to Medicare beneficiaries.

摘要

目的

美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)经美国政府授权,负责审查和传播临床预防服务的科学证据。本研究旨在评估医疗保险预防服务覆盖范围与 USPSTF 建议的一致性,以了解在实施医疗改革之前的情况。

方法

我们记录了 2007 年 Medicare 预防服务指南(包括 2009 年更新版)中所有推荐(A 级或 B 级)USPSTF 以及不推荐(D 级)成人(65 岁及以上)预防筛查和咨询指南中列出的所有 Medicare 预防服务覆盖范围。我们分析了预防保健的 2 个组成部分:预防协调(风险评估、患者动机和预防服务安排)和预防服务本身。主要结果指标是 USPSTF 建议与 Medicare 覆盖范围之间的一致性百分比。

结果

USPSTF 为 65 岁及以上成年人推荐了 15 项预防干预措施。尽管 Medicare 部分报销了 93%的推荐服务,但只有 7%的服务可全额报销预防协调以及服务费用。这种部分覆盖主要作为 Medicare 欢迎访问的一部分提供。此外,USPSTF 建议不提供 16 项预防服务;但 Medicare 为这些服务的 44%报销了临床医生的费用。

结论

需要重新评估 Medicare 预防服务的覆盖范围,特别关注预防协调。继续以前的做法可能会导致预防服务的提供不足和过度。新的医疗改革法有可能改善 Medicare 受益人的预防服务提供。