• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅外颈动脉和椎动脉夹层血管内支架治疗的系统评价:文献回顾。

Endovascular stenting of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections: a systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and McGaw Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;68(4):856-66; discussion 866. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209ce03.

DOI:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209ce03
PMID:21242839
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid and vertebral artery dissections are a leading cause of stroke in young individuals.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the published safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for extracranial artery dissection.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify all cases of endovascular management of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections.

RESULTS

For carotid dissections, our review yielded 31 published reports including 140 patients (153 vessels). Reported etiologies were traumatic (48%, n = 64), spontaneous (37%, n = 49), and iatrogenic (16%, n = 21). The technical success rate of stenting was 99%, and the procedural complication rate was 1.3%. Mean angiographic follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 2-72 months) and revealed in-stent stenosis or occlusion in 2% of patients. Mean clinical follow-up was 17.7 months (range, 1-72 months), and neurological events were seen in 1.4% of patients. For vertebral artery dissections, our review revealed 8 reports including 10 patients (12 vessels). Etiologies were traumatic (60%, n = 6), spontaneous (20%, n = 2), and iatrogenic (20%, n = 2). There was a 100% technical success rate. The mean angiographic follow-up period was 7.5 months (range, 2-12 months). No new neurological events were reported during a mean clinical follow-up period of 26.4 months (range, 3-55 months).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular management of extracranial arterial dissection continues to evolve. Current experience shows that this treatment option is safe and technically feasible. Prospective randomized trials compared with medical management are needed to further elucidate the role of stenting.

摘要

背景

颈动脉和椎动脉夹层是年轻人中风的主要原因。

目的

研究血管内支架治疗颅外动脉夹层的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们对文献进行了系统回顾,以确定所有颅外颈动脉和椎动脉夹层血管内治疗的病例。

结果

对于颈动脉夹层,我们的综述共包括 31 项已发表的报告,涉及 140 例患者(153 支血管)。报告的病因有创伤性(48%,n=64)、自发性(37%,n=49)和医源性(16%,n=21)。支架置入的技术成功率为 99%,手术并发症发生率为 1.3%。平均血管造影随访时间为 12.8 个月(范围,2-72 个月),发现 2%的患者支架内狭窄或闭塞。平均临床随访时间为 17.7 个月(范围,1-72 个月),1.4%的患者出现神经功能事件。对于椎动脉夹层,我们的综述共包括 8 项报告,涉及 10 例患者(12 支血管)。病因有创伤性(60%,n=6)、自发性(20%,n=2)和医源性(20%,n=2)。技术成功率为 100%。平均血管造影随访时间为 7.5 个月(范围,2-12 个月)。平均临床随访 26.4 个月(范围,3-55 个月)期间无新发神经功能事件。

结论

颅外动脉夹层的血管内治疗仍在不断发展。目前的经验表明,这种治疗选择是安全和可行的。需要与药物治疗进行前瞻性随机试验,以进一步阐明支架置入的作用。

相似文献

1
Endovascular stenting of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections: a systematic review of the literature.颅外颈动脉和椎动脉夹层血管内支架治疗的系统评价:文献回顾。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;68(4):856-66; discussion 866. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209ce03.
2
Endovascular treatments of intracranial vertebral and internal carotid arteries dissections: An interactive systematic review and meta-analysis.颅内椎动脉和颈内动脉夹层的血管内治疗:一项交互式系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Feb;30(1):22-30. doi: 10.1177/15910199221095789. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
3
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis.经皮腔内血管成形术及支架置入术治疗椎动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD000516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000516.pub2.
4
Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection.用于颈动脉夹层的抗血栓药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000255.
5
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.经皮腔内血管成形术及支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub2.
6
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in patients with proximal vertebral artery stenosis.经皮腔内血管成形术和支架置入术治疗椎动脉近端狭窄患者。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):1167-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.09.084. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
7
Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection.用于颈动脉夹层的抗血栓药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD000255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000255.
8
Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.经皮腔内球囊血管成形术及支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub4.
9
Endovascular treatment of traumatic internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm.创伤性颈内动脉假性动脉瘤的血管内治疗
Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
Flow-diverting Stent in the Treatment of Cervical Carotid Dissection and Pseudoaneurysm: Review of Literature and Case Report.血流导向支架治疗颈内动脉夹层及假性动脉瘤:文献综述与病例报告
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;46:372-379. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.151. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Case of Delayed-Onset Stent-Induced Dissection of the Internal Carotid Artery After Stenting for Near-Occlusion.一例支架置入治疗颈内动脉近闭塞后迟发性支架诱导的颈内动脉夹层病例
Cureus. 2025 May 10;17(5):e83855. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83855. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Endovascular stenting for extracranial internal carotid artery dissection - single-centre experience and literature overview.颅外颈内动脉夹层的血管内支架置入术——单中心经验及文献综述
Pol J Radiol. 2025 Apr 21;90:e191-e197. doi: 10.5114/pjr/202103. eCollection 2025.
3
Traumatic Vertebral Artery Injury: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Key Considerations for Management.
创伤性椎动脉损伤:诊断、自然病程及管理的关键考量因素
J Clin Med. 2025 May 2;14(9):3159. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093159.
4
Innovative use of a stent retriever for temporary revascularization in acute internal carotid artery dissection.创新使用支架取栓器进行急性颈内动脉夹层的临时血管重建。
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Jul 26;19(10):4316-4321. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.06.077. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Are There Differences between Traumatic and Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissections?创伤性与自发性颈内动脉夹层之间存在差异吗?
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 29;13(15):4443. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154443.
6
Association between cervicocerebral artery dissection and tortuosity - a review on quantitative and qualitative assessment.颈内动脉夹层与迂曲的相关性——定量和定性评估的综述。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jul 8;166(1):285. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06171-2.
7
Post-Traumatic Cerebral Infarction: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.创伤后脑梗死:病理生理学、诊断与治疗的叙述性综述
Neurol Int. 2024 Jan 4;16(1):95-112. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16010006.
8
Balloon-mounted covered stent as endovascular management of a traumatic cervical internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm in a 23-year-old: a case report.球囊扩张带膜支架用于23岁患者创伤性颈内动脉假性动脉瘤的血管内治疗:一例报告
AME Case Rep. 2023 Dec 26;8:17. doi: 10.21037/acr-23-56. eCollection 2024.
9
Endovascular reconstruction of high cervical and long-segment carotid artery dissections with Leo plus stent.使用Leo plus支架对高位颈段和长节段颈动脉夹层进行血管内重建。
Neuroradiology. 2024 Mar;66(3):409-416. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03274-y. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
10
Mechanical Thrombectomy and Parent Artery Occlusion for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Due to Vertebral Fracture and Artery Dissection: A Case Report.因椎体骨折和动脉夹层导致急性基底动脉闭塞的机械取栓和 parent 动脉闭塞:一例报告
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023;17(12):286-292. doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2023-0041. Epub 2023 Sep 1.