Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Leukemia. 2011 Apr;25(4):622-8. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.318. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
The dic(9;20)(p13.2;q11.2) is reported to be present in ∼2% of childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP ALL). However, it easily escapes detection by G-banding analysis and its true prevalence is hence unknown. We performed interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses-in a three-step manner-using probes for: (i) CDKN2A at 9p21, (ii) 20p and 20q subtelomeres and (iii) cen9 and cen20. Out of 1033 BCP ALLs diagnosed from 2001 to 2006, 533 were analyzed; 16% (84/533) displayed 9p21 deletions, of which 30% (25/84) had dic(9;20). Thus, dic(9;20)-positivity was found in 4.7% (25/533), making it the third most common genetic subgroup after high hyperdiploidy and t(12;21)(p13;q22). The dic(9;20) was associated with a female predominance and an age peak at 3 years; 18/25 (72%) were allocated to non-standard risk treatment at diagnosis. Including cases detected by G-banding alone, 29 dic(9;20)-positive cases were treated according to the NOPHO ALL 2000 protocol. Relapses occurred in 24% (7/29) resulting in a 5-year event-free survival of 0.69, which was significantly worse than for t(12;21) (0.87; P=0.002) and high hyperdiploidy (0.82; P=0.04). We conclude that dic(9;20) is twice as common as previously surmised, with many cases going undetected by G-banding analysis, and that dic(9;20) should be considered a non-standard risk abnormality.
该 dic(9;20)(p13.2;q11.2) 被报道存在于约 2%的儿童 B 细胞前体急性淋巴细胞白血病 (BCP ALL) 中。然而,它很容易逃脱 G 带分析的检测,因此其真实患病率尚不清楚。我们采用 CDKN2A 探针在 9p21 处、20p 和 20q 端粒处以及 cen9 和 cen20 处进行了三步法的间期荧光原位杂交分析。在 2001 年至 2006 年间诊断的 1033 例 BCP ALL 中,有 533 例进行了分析;16%(84/533)显示 9p21 缺失,其中 30%(25/84)存在 dic(9;20)。因此,dic(9;20)阳性率为 4.7%(25/533),使其成为继高倍体性和 t(12;21)(p13;q22)之后的第三大常见遗传亚组。dic(9;20)与女性为主和 3 岁时的年龄高峰相关;18/25(72%)在诊断时被分配到非标准风险治疗。包括单独通过 G 带检测到的病例,29 例 dic(9;20)阳性病例根据 NOPHO ALL 2000 方案进行治疗。24%(7/29)发生复发,导致 5 年无事件生存率为 0.69,显著低于 t(12;21)(0.87;P=0.002)和高倍体性(0.82;P=0.04)。我们的结论是,dic(9;20)的频率是之前推测的两倍,许多病例通过 G 带分析无法检测到,并且 dic(9;20)应被视为非标准风险异常。