Suppr超能文献

自由思想、自由恋爱与女权主义:1850至1885年前后英国关于婚姻与性道德的世俗主义辩论

Freethought, free love and feminism: secularist debates on marriage and sexual morality, England c. 1850-1885.

作者信息

Schwartz Laura

机构信息

St Hugh’s College, University of Oxford.

出版信息

Womens Hist Rev. 2010;19(5):775-93. doi: 10.1080/09612025.2010.509162.

Abstract

This article examines the previously unexplored current of Freethinking feminism in the second half of the nineteenth century. Active in the women's movement of this period, Freethinking feminists were nonetheless viewed as a liability—an attitude that contributed to their exclusion from much of the subsequent historiography. Such marginalisation was due not only to their vocal opposition to all forms of religion, but also their openness to discussing new ways of organising heterosexual relationships. This article focuses on Freethinking feminist critiques of marriage and support for free unions. It demonstrates that these issues continued to be debated in the Secularist movement at a time when many other radical organisations—including much of the women's movement—kept silent on such topics. In this way, Freethinking feminists kept alive the more radical and libertarian critiques of traditional sexual morality developed by Owenite feminists in the 1830s and 40s. The author argues that the ideology of Freethought propelled its adherents to readdress questions of sex within a new 'Secularist' ethical framework. Fierce debate ensued, yet commitment to freedom of discussion ensured that 'unrespectable', libertarian voices were never entirely silenced. Freethinking feminism might, then, be viewed as the 'missing link' between early nineteenth-century feminist visions of greater sexual freedom and the more radical discussions of sexuality and free love that began to emerge at the fin de sicle.

摘要

本文探讨了19世纪下半叶自由思想女权主义这一此前未被探索的思潮。自由思想女权主义者活跃于这一时期的妇女运动,但却被视为一种负担——这种态度导致她们在随后的许多历史编纂中被排除在外。这种边缘化不仅是因为她们直言反对所有形式的宗教,还因为她们乐于讨论组织异性恋关系的新方式。本文聚焦于自由思想女权主义者对婚姻的批判以及对自由结合的支持。文章表明,在许多其他激进组织——包括许多妇女运动组织——对这些话题保持沉默之际,这些问题在世俗主义运动中仍在被讨论。通过这种方式,自由思想女权主义者让欧文派女权主义者在19世纪30年代和40年代提出的对传统性道德更为激进和自由的批判得以延续。作者认为,自由思想的意识形态促使其追随者在一个新的“世俗主义”伦理框架内重新审视性问题。激烈的辩论随之而来,但对言论自由的坚持确保了那些“不受尊重的”、自由的声音从未完全沉寂。那么,自由思想女权主义可以被视为19世纪早期女权主义者对更大性自由的愿景与19世纪末开始出现的关于性和自由恋爱的更为激进的讨论之间的“缺失环节”。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验