Lueken Ulrike, Hoyer Jürgen, Siegert Jens, Gloster Andrew T, Wittchen Hans-Ulrich
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Feb;119(1):61-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00790.x.
Although video stimulation has been successfully employed in dental phobia, conclusions regarding the specificity of reactions are limited. A novel, video-based paradigm using cross-phobic video stimulation was validated based on subjective and autonomic responses. Forty subjects were stratified according to dental anxiety as measured by the Dental Fear Survey (DFS) using a median-split procedure (high-DFS and low-DFS groups). Anxiety stimuli comprised dental-anxiety scenes and non-dental-anxiety control scenes (snake stimuli). Neutral scenes were tailored to each anxiety stimulus. Dental, but not snake, stimuli were rated as more anxiety provoking only in the high-DFS group. Elevated skin-conductance amplitudes were observed in the high-DFS group for dental anxiety vs. neutral videos, but not for snake anxiety vs. neutral videos. State and trait anxiety and autonomic reactivity were correlated according to expectations. Using cross-phobic video stimulation, it was demonstrated that phobogenic reactions in dental anxiety are specific to the respective stimulus material and do not generalize to other non-dental-anxiety control conditions. The validation of the paradigm may support and stimulate future research on the characterization of dental anxiety on different response systems, including its underlying neural substrates.
尽管视频刺激已成功应用于牙科恐惧症,但关于反应特异性的结论有限。基于主观和自主反应,一种使用跨恐惧症视频刺激的新型视频范式得到了验证。根据牙科恐惧调查(DFS)通过中位数分割程序测量的牙科焦虑程度,将40名受试者分层(高DFS组和低DFS组)。焦虑刺激包括牙科焦虑场景和非牙科焦虑对照场景(蛇刺激)。中性场景是根据每种焦虑刺激量身定制的。只有在高DFS组中,牙科刺激而非蛇刺激被评为更能引发焦虑。在高DFS组中,观察到牙科焦虑视频与中性视频相比皮肤电导幅度升高,但蛇焦虑视频与中性视频相比则未观察到。状态和特质焦虑以及自主反应性与预期一致相关。使用跨恐惧症视频刺激表明,牙科焦虑中的致恐惧反应特定于各自的刺激材料,不会推广到其他非牙科焦虑对照条件。该范式的验证可能支持并刺激未来关于不同反应系统中牙科焦虑特征的研究,包括其潜在的神经基质。