Watenpaugh Keith David
Univ. of California, Davis.
Am Hist Rev. 2010;115(5):1315-39. doi: 10.1086/ahr.115.5.1315.
The essay centers of the efforts by the League of Nations to rescue women and children survivors of the 1915 Armenian Genocide. This rescue -- a seemingly unambiguous good -- was at once a constitutive act in drawing the boundaries of the international community, a key moment in the definition of humanitarianism, and a site of resistance to the colonial presence in the post-Ottoman Eastern Mediterranean. Drawing from a wide range of source materials in a number of languages, including Turkish, Armenian, and Arabic, the essay brings the intellectual and social context of humanitarianism in initiating societies together with the lived experience of humanitarianism in the places where the act took form. In so doing, it draws our attention to the proper place of the Eastern mediterranean, and its women and children, in the global history of humanitarianism. The prevailing narrative of the history of human rights places much of its emphasis on the post-World War II era, the international reaction to the Holocaust, and the founding of the United Nations. yet contemporary human rights thinking also took place within practices of humanitarianism in the interwar period, and is necessarily inseparable from the histories of refugees, colonialism, and the non-West.
这篇文章聚焦于国际联盟为救助1915年亚美尼亚种族灭绝事件中的妇女和儿童幸存者所做的努力。这种救助——看似明确的善举——同时也是划定国际社会边界的构成性行动、人道主义定义中的关键时刻,以及在后奥斯曼帝国东地中海地区抵制殖民存在的场所。文章借鉴了包括土耳其语、亚美尼亚语和阿拉伯语在内的多种语言的大量原始资料,将发起社会中人道主义的知识和社会背景与该行动形成地的人道主义生活经历结合起来。这样做,它让我们关注东地中海及其妇女和儿童在全球人道主义历史中的恰当位置。人权历史的主流叙事大多强调二战后时期、国际社会对大屠杀的反应以及联合国的成立。然而,当代人权思想也在两次世界大战之间的人道主义实践中出现,并且必然与难民、殖民主义和非西方的历史密不可分。