Konstantinidis Agathoklis, Plurad David, Barmparas Galinos, Inaba Kenji, Lam Lydia, Bukur Marko, Branco Bernardino C, Demetriades Demetrios
Division of Acute Care Surgery (Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care), Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033-4525, USA.
J Trauma. 2011 Sep;71(3):528-32. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f8a8e0.
A distracting injury mandates cervical spine (c-spine) imaging in the evaluable blunt trauma patient who demonstrates no pain or tenderness over the c-spine. The purpose of this study was to examine which distracting injuries can negatively affect the sensitivity of the standard clinical examination of the c-spine.
This is a prospective observational study conducted at a Level I Trauma Center from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009. After institutional review board approval, all evaluable (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥13) blunt trauma patients older than 16 years sustaining a c-spine injury were enrolled. A distracting injury was defined as any immediately evident bony or soft tissue injury or a complaint of non-c-spine pain whether or not an actual injury was subsequently diagnosed. Information regarding the initial clinical examination and the presence of a distracting injury was collected from the senior resident or attending trauma surgeon involved in the initial management.
During the study period, 101 evaluable patients sustained a c-spine injury. Distracting injuries were present in 88 patients (87.1%). The most common was rib fracture (21.6%), followed by lower extremity fracture (20.5%) and upper extremity fracture (12.5%). Only four (4.0%) patients had no pain or tenderness on the initial examination of the c-spine. All four patients had bruising and tenderness to the upper anterior chest. None of these four patients developed neurologic sequelae or required a surgical stabilization or immobilization.
C-spine imaging may not be required in the evaluable blunt trauma patient despite distracting injuries in any body regions that do not involve the upper chest. Further definition of distracting injuries is mandated to avoid unnecessary utilization of resources and to reduce the imaging burden associated with the evaluation of the c-spine.
对于可评估的钝性创伤患者,若其颈椎无疼痛或压痛,则因存在分散注意力的损伤而需进行颈椎(C 脊柱)成像检查。本研究的目的是探讨哪些分散注意力的损伤会对颈椎的标准临床检查敏感性产生负面影响。
这是一项于 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日在一级创伤中心进行的前瞻性观察研究。经机构审查委员会批准,纳入所有年龄大于 16 岁、可评估(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≥13)且遭受颈椎损伤的钝性创伤患者。分散注意力的损伤定义为任何即刻明显的骨或软组织损伤,或主诉非颈椎疼痛,无论后续是否诊断出实际损伤。从参与初始治疗的高级住院医师或主治创伤外科医生处收集有关初始临床检查及分散注意力损伤存在情况的信息。
在研究期间,101 例可评估患者遭受颈椎损伤。88 例(87.1%)患者存在分散注意力的损伤。最常见的是肋骨骨折(21.6%),其次是下肢骨折(20.5%)和上肢骨折(12.5%)。仅 4 例(4.0%)患者在颈椎初始检查时无疼痛或压痛。这 4 例患者均有上前胸淤青和压痛。这 4 例患者均未出现神经后遗症,也无需手术固定或制动。
对于可评估的钝性创伤患者,尽管身体任何部位存在分散注意力的损伤,但只要不涉及上胸部,可能无需进行颈椎成像检查。需要进一步明确分散注意力的损伤,以避免不必要的资源利用,并减轻与颈椎评估相关的成像负担。