Haematology Service, University Hospital Joan XXIII, IISPV, Rovira and Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;30(7):845-52. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1164-7. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of neutrophil CD64 expression for bacterial infection in febrile adult patients presenting to our hospital emergency department. We prospectively included 132 patients with fever ≥ 38ºC (≥ 100.4ºF) during the last 24 hours and we measured CD64 expression on neutrophils the day after admission at the emergency department. We followed the patients until full recovery or death. There were 115 (87%) patients with bacterial infection and 108 (94%) of them survived. There were 17 (13%) patients without bacterial infection and 12 (71%) of them survived. Patients with bacterial infection and patients who survived showed a CD64 index higher when compared with patients without bacterial infection and patients who died, respectively (3.7 ± 3.2 vs. 2.5 ± 2.3; p = 0.03; and 3.7 ± 3.1 vs. 1.7 ± 0.6; p = 0.002; Mann-Whitney U test). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for detecting bacterial infection and predicting survival with the CD64 index showed an area under curve (AUC) of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.52-0.8; p = 0.03) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.85; p = 0.01), respectively. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of CD64 expression was good in adult patients with fever.
本研究旨在评估中性粒细胞 CD64 表达在我院急诊发热成人患者细菌感染中的诊断准确性和预后价值。我们前瞻性纳入了 132 例发热(24 小时内≥38℃,≥100.4°F)的患者,入院后次日在急诊测量中性粒细胞 CD64 表达。我们随访患者直至完全康复或死亡。其中 115 例(87%)患者有细菌感染,108 例(94%)存活。17 例(13%)患者无细菌感染,12 例(71%)存活。与无细菌感染和死亡的患者相比,有细菌感染和存活的患者的 CD64 指数更高(3.7 ± 3.2 与 2.5 ± 2.3;p = 0.03;3.7 ± 3.1 与 1.7 ± 0.6;p = 0.002;Mann-Whitney U 检验)。ROC 曲线分析显示,以 CD64 指数检测细菌感染和预测生存的 AUC 分别为 0.66(95%CI,0.52-0.8;p = 0.03)和 0.71(95%CI,0.57-0.85;p = 0.01)。在发热的成年患者中,CD64 表达的诊断准确性和预后价值良好。