Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 2, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.
Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):73-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01628.x.
Wildflower harvesting is an economically important activity of which the ecological effects are poorly understood. We assessed how harvesting of flowers affects shrub persistence and abundance at multiple spatial extents. To this end, we built a process-based model to examine the mean persistence and abundance of wild shrubs whose flowers are subject to harvest (serotinous Proteaceae in the South African Cape Floristic Region). First, we conducted a general sensitivity analysis of how harvesting affects persistence and abundance at nested spatial extents. For most spatial extents and combinations of demographic parameters, persistence and abundance of flowering shrubs decreased abruptly once harvesting rate exceeded a certain threshold. At larger extents, metapopulations supported higher harvesting rates before their persistence and abundance decreased, but persistence and abundance also decreased more abruptly due to harvesting than at smaller extents. This threshold rate of harvest varied with species' dispersal ability, maximum reproductive rate, adult mortality, probability of extirpation or local extinction, strength of Allee effects, and carrying capacity. Moreover, spatial extent interacted with Allee effects and probability of extirpation because both these demographic properties affected the response of local populations to harvesting more strongly than they affected the response of metapopulations. Subsequently, we simulated the effects of harvesting on three Cape Floristic Region Proteaceae species and found that these species reacted differently to harvesting, but their persistence and abundance decreased at low rates of harvest. Our estimates of harvesting rates at maximum sustainable yield differed from those of previous investigations, perhaps because researchers used different estimates of demographic parameters, models of population dynamics, and spatial extent than we did. Good demographic knowledge and careful identification of the spatial extent of interest increases confidence in assessments and monitoring of the effects of harvesting. Our general sensitivity analysis improved understanding of harvesting effects on metapopulation dynamics and allowed qualitative assessment of the probability of extirpation of poorly studied species.
野外花卉采摘是一项具有重要经济意义的活动,但人们对其生态影响知之甚少。我们评估了花卉采摘如何在多个空间尺度上影响灌木的持久性和丰度。为此,我们构建了一个基于过程的模型,以研究其花朵可被采摘的野生灌木(南非开普花卉区的肉质植物科植物)的持久性和丰度。首先,我们对采摘如何影响嵌套空间尺度上的持久性和丰度进行了一般性敏感性分析。对于大多数空间尺度和人口统计参数组合,一旦采摘率超过一定阈值,开花灌木的持久性和丰度就会急剧下降。在较大的尺度上,由于收获,集合种群在其持久性和丰度下降之前支持更高的收获率,但与较小的尺度相比,由于收获,持久性和丰度下降得更突然。这个收获的阈值率随物种的扩散能力、最大繁殖率、成体死亡率、灭绝或局部灭绝的概率、聚集效应的强度和承载能力而变化。此外,空间尺度与聚集效应和灭绝概率相互作用,因为这两个人口统计特性对局部种群对收获的反应的影响比对集合种群的反应更强烈。随后,我们模拟了收获对三种开普花卉区肉质植物科植物的影响,发现这些物种对收获的反应不同,但它们的持久性和丰度在低收获率下下降。我们对最大可持续产量的收获率的估计与以前的调查不同,这可能是因为研究人员使用了不同的人口统计参数、种群动态模型和空间尺度,而不是我们使用的模型。良好的人口统计知识和仔细确定感兴趣的空间尺度可以提高对收获效果评估和监测的信心。我们的一般性敏感性分析提高了对收获对集合种群动态影响的理解,并允许对研究较少的物种灭绝概率进行定性评估。