Suppr超能文献

新傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描的体外验证。

In vitro validation of new Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

机构信息

Harrington McLaughlin Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-5038, USA.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2011 Feb;6(7):875-82. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I7A149.

Abstract

AIMS

To validate the accuracy and evaluate the intra- and inter-observer variability of vascular measurements using novel Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) versus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in a coronary phantom model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A dedicated cylindrical phantom comprised of four sections with differing dimensions was used to compare images generated by five FD-OCT and five IVUS catheters. Each FD-OCT catheter was tested using three different consoles, generating 15 imaging pullbacks. Two independent experts, blinded to the phantom data, performed measurements. There were 180 FD-OCT and 60 IVUS cross-sectional measurements of mean lumen diameter (MeanLD), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), maximum lumen diameter (MaxLD) and lumen area (LA) at three points in each section. FD-OCT measurements had excellent correlations with IVUS (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC]: ≥0.9769 for MeanLD, LA or longitudinal length [LL]) and phantom dimensions (CCCs for FD-OCT: ≥0.9958 for MeanLD, LA or LL). FD-OCT measurements were larger than IVUS (p<0.0001), but showed less measurement errors compared to IVUS (p<0.0001). Moreover, FD-OCT caused less discrepancy between MaxLD and MLD versus IVUS (p<0.0001). Intra- and inter-observer variability was low for both FD-OCT (CCCs for MeanLD, LA and LL ≥0.9996) and IVUS (≥0.9935). Image catheter position did not influence FD-OCT measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

FD-OCT was more accurate than IVUS and had similar high reproducibility to determine vascular dimensions in vitro. These results support the use of FD-OCT in the clinical setting.

摘要

目的

在冠状动脉模型中,使用新型傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描(FD-OCT)与血管内超声(IVUS)比较,验证血管测量的准确性,并评估其观察者内和观察者间的可变性。

方法和结果

使用包含四个不同尺寸部分的专用圆柱状模型来比较 5 个 FD-OCT 和 5 个 IVUS 导管生成的图像。每个 FD-OCT 导管均使用三个不同控制台进行测试,生成 15 个成像拉回。两名独立的专家对模型数据进行盲法评估,进行测量。每个节段有 180 个 FD-OCT 和 60 个 IVUS 横截面测量,包括平均管腔直径(MeanLD)、最小管腔直径(MLD)、最大管腔直径(MaxLD)和管腔面积(LA),在每个节段的三个点进行测量。FD-OCT 测量值与 IVUS 具有极好的相关性(MeanLD、LA 或纵向长度的一致性相关系数[CCC]:≥0.9769),与模型尺寸也具有极好的相关性(MeanLD、LA 或 LL 的 CCC:≥0.9958)。FD-OCT 测量值大于 IVUS(p<0.0001),但与 IVUS 相比,测量误差更小(p<0.0001)。此外,FD-OCT 导致 MaxLD 和 MLD 与 IVUS 的差异小于 IVUS(p<0.0001)。FD-OCT 的观察者内和观察者间的变异性均较低(MeanLD、LA 和 LL 的 CCC 均≥0.9996),IVUS 的变异性也较高(≥0.9935)。图像导管位置不影响 FD-OCT 测量值。

结论

FD-OCT 比 IVUS 更准确,在体外确定血管尺寸方面具有相似的高可重复性。这些结果支持在临床环境中使用 FD-OCT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验