Department of Personnel and Employment Relations, Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr;23(2):210-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq088. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
To explore the relationship between junior doctors' long working hours and their performance in a variety of cognitive and clinical decision-making tests. Also, to consider the implications of performance decrements in such tests for healthcare quality.
A within-subject design was used to eliminate variation related to individual differences. Each participant was tested twice, once post call and once rested. At each session, participants were tested on cognitive functioning and clinical decision-making.
The study was based on six acute Irish hospitals during 2008.
Thirty junior hospital doctors, ages ranged from 23 to 30 years; of them, 17 of the participants were female and 13 were male. Measures Cognitive functioning was measured by the MindStreams Global Assessment Battery (NeuroTrax Corp., NY, USA). This is a set of computerized tests, designed for use in medical settings, that assesses performance in memory, executive function, visual spatial perception, verbal function, attention, information processing speed and motor skills. Clinical decision-making was tested using Key Features Problems. Each Key Features Problem consists of a case scenario and then three to four questions about this scenario. In an effort to make it more realistic, the speed with which participants completed the three problems was also recorded.
Participants' global cognitive scores, attention, information processing speed and motor skills were significantly worse post call than when rested. They also took longer to complete clinical decision-making questions in the post-call condition and obtained lower scores than when rested.
There are significant negative changes in doctors' cognitive functioning and clinical decision-making performance that appear to be attributable to long working hours. This therefore raises the important question of whether working long hours decreases healthcare quality and compromises patient safety.
探讨初级医生工作时间长与多种认知和临床决策测试表现之间的关系。同时,考虑此类测试中表现下降对医疗质量的影响。
采用自身对照设计消除与个体差异相关的变异性。每位参与者接受两次测试,一次是在值班后,一次是在休息后。每次测试,参与者都要接受认知功能和临床决策测试。
2008 年在爱尔兰的六家急性医院进行。
30 名初级医院医生,年龄在 23 至 30 岁之间;其中,17 名参与者为女性,13 名参与者为男性。
认知功能通过 MindStreams 全球评估电池(NeuroTrax 公司,纽约,美国)进行测量。这是一套计算机化测试,旨在用于医疗环境中,评估记忆、执行功能、视觉空间感知、语言功能、注意力、信息处理速度和运动技能。临床决策使用关键特征问题进行测试。每个关键特征问题都包含一个案例场景,然后是关于该场景的三到四个问题。为了使测试更具现实意义,还记录了参与者完成三个问题的速度。
与休息时相比,参与者的整体认知评分、注意力、信息处理速度和运动技能在值班后明显更差。他们在值班后完成临床决策问题的速度也更长,得分也低于休息时。
医生的认知功能和临床决策表现出现明显的负面变化,似乎归因于工作时间长。这就提出了一个重要问题,即长时间工作是否会降低医疗质量并影响患者安全。