Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Blood Purif. 2011;32(1):21-9. doi: 10.1159/000323140. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is present in a majority of hemodialysis (HD) patients and is among the strongest risk factors for cardiovascular events and mortality. Hemofiltration (HF), a purely convective dialysis treatment, has been associated with enhanced hemodynamic stability compared with HD, possibly as a result of a more physiologic removal of fluid and solutes.
In a randomized controlled study conducted at ten dialysis centers in Sweden and Denmark, incident patients (HD <3 months) without clinical signs or history of cardiovascular disease were randomized to treatment with either online, predilution HF or low-flux HD. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI), as measured by two-dimensional M-mode and Doppler echocardiography.
The analyses included 34 patients (18 HF, 16 HD) followed for up to 2 years. At baseline, 65% of the patients had LVH, but LVMI did not differ between the study groups. In the HF group, LVMI decreased by 22 ± 48 g/m(2) during a mean treatment time of 19 ± 7 months, while in the HD group the decrease was 15 ± 57 g/m(2) during 16 ± 7 months. As analyzed by MANOVA (mixed model), the difference in LVMI over the whole period was statistically significant (p = 0.03) with a more favorable outcome in HF. Blood pressure and other study variables did not differ between the groups, but at baseline and throughout the study, HF patients required heavier antihypertensive treatment.
In incident dialysis patients, long-term predilution HF, a purely convective dialysis treatment, is associated with a significantly more favorable development of LVMI compared with regular low-flux HD. Considering the predictive strength of LVMI as a risk factor, the quantitative difference between the treatments is of clinical importance.
左心室肥厚(LVH)存在于大多数血液透析(HD)患者中,是心血管事件和死亡率的最强危险因素之一。与 HD 相比,单纯超滤(HF)作为一种纯对流透析治疗,与增强的血液动力学稳定性相关,这可能是由于更生理性地去除液体和溶质。
在瑞典和丹麦的十个透析中心进行的一项随机对照研究中,无临床症状或心血管疾病史的新发病例(HD<3 个月)患者被随机分为在线、预稀释 HF 或低通量 HD 治疗组。主要终点是二维 M 型和多普勒超声心动图测量的左心室质量指数(LVMI)的变化。
分析包括 34 例患者(18 例 HF,16 例 HD),随访时间长达 2 年。在基线时,65%的患者存在 LVH,但两组间 LVMI 无差异。在 HF 组,LVMI 在平均治疗时间 19±7 个月期间下降了 22±48g/m2,而在 HD 组,LVMI 在 16±7 个月期间下降了 15±57g/m2。如 MANOVA(混合模型)分析所示,整个研究期间 LVMI 的差异具有统计学意义(p=0.03),HF 组的结果更为有利。血压和其他研究变量在两组间无差异,但在基线和整个研究期间,HF 患者需要更重的降压治疗。
在新发病例透析患者中,长期预稀释 HF 作为一种纯对流透析治疗,与常规低通量 HD 相比,LVMI 的发展更有利。考虑到 LVMI 作为危险因素的预测强度,两种治疗方法之间的定量差异具有临床意义。