• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发表欺诈:对个人和专业的影响。

Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Apr;24(2):154-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328344529d.

DOI:10.1097/ACO.0b013e328344529d
PMID:21252647
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a brief review and update on the subject of scientific misconduct relevant to the specialty of anesthesia. The overall goal is to raise awareness amongst readers of the scientific literature that although publication fraud is relatively infrequent, the reasons for fraud are complex and the consequences to the individual and for the specialty are substantial.

RECENT FINDINGS

Scientific misconduct and publication fraud can easily go undetected. However, plagiarism is being detected with increasing frequency as a result of newer detection software. There are recent examples of scientific misconduct involving extensive data fabrication in the anesthesiology literature that have far-reaching, and as-yet-to-be determined implications for the scientific record. The reasons for publication fraud and methods to detect scientific misconduct are reviewed. The implications for related studies in the field, systematic reviews and practice guidelines are considered.

SUMMARY

When suspected, alleged misconduct must be thoroughly investigated. When proven, scientific misconduct must be addressed by the relevant institutions and the scientific record must be corrected. Many stakeholders are involved in this complex and most unfortunate process.

摘要

目的综述

提供一个简要的综述和更新,主题是与麻醉专业相关的科学不端行为。总体目标是提高读者对科学文献的认识,尽管出版欺诈相对较少见,但欺诈的原因很复杂,对个人和专业的影响是巨大的。

最近的发现

科学不端行为和出版欺诈很容易被忽视。然而,由于新型检测软件的出现,剽窃行为的检测频率越来越高。最近有一些涉及麻醉学文献中广泛数据捏造的科学不端行为的例子,这些例子对科学记录产生了深远的、尚未确定的影响。本文回顾了出版欺诈的原因和检测科学不端行为的方法,并考虑了对该领域相关研究、系统评价和实践指南的影响。

总结

当怀疑有不当行为时,必须进行彻底调查。一旦被证实,相关机构必须处理科学不端行为,必须纠正科学记录。许多利益相关者都参与了这个复杂而不幸的过程。

相似文献

1
Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty.发表欺诈:对个人和专业的影响。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Apr;24(2):154-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328344529d.
2
Academic fraud: perspectives from a lifelong anesthesia researcher.学术欺诈:一位终身麻醉学研究者的观点
Can J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;58(9):782-4, 784-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9523-5.
3
Scientific Misconduct (Fraud) in Medical Writing.医学写作中的科研不端行为(欺诈)
Orthopedics. 2018 Mar 1;41(2):e176-e183. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180123-06. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
4
[Misconduct in medical-scientific publishing].[医学科研出版中的不当行为]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994 Sep 3;138(36):1822-6.
5
Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?科学文献中的撤稿:研究造假的发生率在增加吗?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Apr;37(4):249-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040923. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
6
Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room?科学不端行为:冰山一角还是显而易见却被忽视的重大问题?
J Dent Res. 2010 Dec;89(12):1364-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034510384627. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
7
Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct.出版伦理委员会关于疑似出版不当行为的流程图。
Maturitas. 2009 Mar 20;62(3):208-24. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
8
Presentation, publication, and promotion--four views on the subject.
Fam Med. 1994 Jun;26(6):370-1.
9
Scientific fraud in 20 falsified anesthesia papers : detection using financial auditing methods.20篇伪造麻醉学论文中的科学欺诈行为:运用财务审计方法进行检测
Anaesthesist. 2012 Jun;61(6):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-012-2029-x.
10
Scientific frustration, fraud and plagiarism in biomedicine.
J Assoc Physicians India. 2004 Sep;52:759.

引用本文的文献

1
Publication fraud, dishonesty, and deceit.发表欺诈、不诚实和欺骗行为。
J Man Manip Ther. 2012 May;20(2):57-8. doi: 10.1179/106698112X13231784786097.
2
Ethical considerations in scientific writing.科学写作中的伦理考量。
Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2011 Jul;32(2):124-8. doi: 10.4103/0253-7184.85425.