• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未校准的股动脉搏出量变异度在肝移植无肝期预测液体反应性的作用。

Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2011 Jan;17(1):53-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22186.

DOI:10.1002/lt.22186
PMID:21254345
Abstract

We evaluated the value of the stroke volume variation (SVV) calculated with the Vigileo monitor, which recently has been increasingly advocated for fluid management, as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation (LT). We also compared SVV to the central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure (PAOP) in patients. Thirty-three adult recipients scheduled for elective living donor LT were enrolled in this study. Twenty minutes after the start of the anhepatic phase, the CVP, PAOP, approximate inferior vena caval pressure, femoral SVV, and cardiac output values were measured before and 12 minutes after fluid loading. Fluid loading was performed with a 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution (10 mL/kg). The responders were defined as patients whose cardiac index increased ≥ 15% after fluid loading. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that only femoral SVV (area under the curve = 0.894, P = 0.0001) could be used to predict fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of LT. The area under the ROC curve for femoral SVV was 0.894 (P = 0.0001), and it was significantly larger than those for CVP (area under the curve = 0.576, P = 0.004) and PAOP (area under the curve = 0.670, P = 0.021). Femoral SVV >8% identified the responders with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 80%. Our results suggest that femoral SVV derived with the Vigileo monitor would be useful for fluid management during the anhepatic phase in LT recipients.

摘要

我们评估了最近越来越多被推荐用于液体管理的 Vigileo 监测仪计算的每搏量变异(SVV)作为肝移植(LT)无肝期液体反应性的预测指标的价值。我们还比较了 SVV 与中心静脉压(CVP)和肺动脉闭塞压(PAOP)在患者中的差异。本研究纳入了 33 名计划接受择期活体供者 LT 的成年受者。无肝期开始后 20 分钟,测量液体负荷前和负荷后 12 分钟的 CVP、PAOP、近似下腔静脉压、股 SVV 和心输出量值。液体负荷使用 6%羟乙基淀粉溶液(10 mL/kg)。将心指数增加≥15%定义为液体反应性患者。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示,只有股 SVV(曲线下面积=0.894,P=0.0001)可用于预测 LT 无肝期的液体反应性。股 SVV 的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.894(P=0.0001),明显大于 CVP(曲线下面积=0.576,P=0.004)和 PAOP(曲线下面积=0.670,P=0.021)。股 SVV>8%可识别出 89%的敏感性和 80%的特异性的反应者。我们的结果表明,Vigileo 监测仪得出的股 SVV 将有助于 LT 受者无肝期的液体管理。

相似文献

1
Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.未校准的股动脉搏出量变异度在肝移植无肝期预测液体反应性的作用。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Jan;17(1):53-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22186.
2
Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.在接受大手术的机械通气患者中,与潮气量变异相比,每搏变异度预测液体反应性的准确性。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):555-61. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335fbd1.
3
Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.脓毒性休克患者液体反应性的预测:FloTrac/Vigileo 监测的每搏量变异度与自动脉搏压变异度的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Feb;29(2):64-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834b7d82.
4
Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.手臂闭塞压是心脏手术后液体负荷后心输出量增加的有用预测指标。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):802-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a67d2.
5
Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.动态预负荷指标无法预测开胸情况下的液体反应性。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):510-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958bf7.
6
Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.左心室每搏输出量变异度在评估心功能减退患者液体反应性中的应用价值
Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1399-404. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000059442.37548.E1.
7
Comparison of stroke volume variations derived from radial and femoral arterial pressure waveforms during liver transplantation.肝移植期间经桡动脉和股动脉压力波形得出的每搏量变异的比较。
Transplant Proc. 2009 Dec;41(10):4220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.09.050.
8
The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.CNAP™ 设备测量的脉压变化能力可预测手术室中的液体反应性。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Sep;113(3):523-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182240054. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
9
Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.脉压变异度预测非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术心脏移位期间的液体反应性。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):1056-62. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
10
Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.比较动脉收缩压变化与其他临床参数以预测心脏手术期间对液体冲击的反应。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2002 Jan-Mar;69(1-2):96-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Restrictive versus goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery (RiGoROCS): A randomised controlled trial.卵巢癌肿瘤细胞减灭术中限制性液体补充策略与目标导向性液体补充策略的比较(RiGoROCS):一项随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Dec;67(12):1101-1109. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_489_23. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Effect of cardiac output - guided hemodynamic management on acute lung injury in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.心输出量导向的血流动力学管理对小儿活体肝移植中急性肺损伤的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Sep 27;14(9):1037-1048. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1037.
3
Ability of dynamic preload indices to predict fluid responsiveness in a high femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient: a retrospective study.
高股动脉与桡动脉压力梯度下动态预负荷指标预测液体反应性的能力:一项回顾性研究。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Oct;16(4):360-367. doi: 10.17085/apm.21001. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.脉搏压变异度、每搏量变异度与中心静脉压在肾移植患者中的对比研究。
Singapore Med J. 2022 Dec;63(12):731-739. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021221. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
Dynamic Indices Fail to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation for Thoracoscopic Surgery.动态指标无法预测接受胸腔镜手术单肺通气患者的液体反应性。
J Clin Med. 2021 May 27;10(11):2335. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112335.
6
Utility of central venous pressure measurement in renal transplantation: Is it evidence based?中心静脉压测量在肾移植中的效用:它有循证依据吗?
World J Transplant. 2018 Jun 28;8(3):61-67. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i3.61.
7
Evaluation of New Calibrated Pulse-Wave Analysis (VolumeViewTM/EV1000TM) for Cardiac Output Monitoring Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation.新型校准脉搏波分析(VolumeViewTM/EV1000TM)用于活体肝移植术中的心输出量监测评估。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0164521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164521. eCollection 2016.
8
Evaluation of pleth variability index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during orthotopic liver transplantation.评估脉压变异指数作为原位肝移植期间液体反应性预测指标的价值。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Jul;32(7):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Intravascular volume therapy in adults: Guidelines from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany.成人血管内容量治疗:德国科学医学协会指南
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jul;33(7):488-521. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000447.
10
Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.系统评价,包括对1148个中心静脉压个体数据集进行重新分析,以作为液体反应性的预测指标。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;42(3):324-332. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4168-4. Epub 2015 Dec 9.