General Medicine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2011 Feb;14(2):169-77. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0299. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
Few studies have evaluated the end-of-life preferences of elderly patients in rural communities and whether preferences are associated with level of health literacy.
Randomized controlled trial of a goals-of-care video decision aid of advanced dementia.
Elderly subjects (65 years or older) at a primary care clinic in rural Louisiana.
Half of subjects heard a verbal description of advanced dementia and the goals of care; the other half heard the same verbal description and then viewed the video decision aid. End points were the preferred goal of care in advanced dementia: life-prolonging care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], etc.), limited care (hospitalization but not CPR), or comfort care (symptom relief). The principal category for analysis was the difference in proportions of subjects preferring comfort care for each characteristic including randomization group and health literacy level.
Seventy-six subjects were randomized to the verbal (n = 43) or video (n = 33) arms of the study. Among subjects receiving the verbal description of advanced dementia and the goals of care, 31 (72%) preferred comfort; 5 (12%) chose limited; and 7 (16%) desired life-prolonging. In the video group, 30 (91%) preferred comfort; 3 (9%) chose limited; and none desired life-prolonging (χ(2) = 6.3, df = 2, p = 0.047). Factors associated with greater likelihood of opting for comfort included greater health literacy (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 12.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-62.6) and randomization to the video (unadjusted OR 3.9; 95% CI, 1.0-15.1).
Rural subjects with higher health literacy were more likely to want comfort care compared to those with lower levels of health literacy. Furthermore, subjects who viewed a video decision aid were more likely to opt for comfort compared to those who solely listened to a verbal description. These findings suggest that video can help elicit preferences and that interventions to empower such patients need to be designed in a manner that is sensitive to health literacy.
很少有研究评估农村社区老年患者的临终偏好,以及这些偏好是否与健康素养水平有关。
一项关于高级痴呆症的治疗目标视频决策辅助工具的随机对照试验。
路易斯安那州农村初级保健诊所的老年患者(65 岁或以上)。
一半的患者听到了关于高级痴呆症和治疗目标的口头描述;另一半患者则在听到相同的口头描述后观看了视频决策辅助工具。终点是高级痴呆症的首选治疗目标:延长生命的治疗(心肺复苏术等)、有限的治疗(住院但不进行心肺复苏术)或舒适的治疗(缓解症状)。主要的分析类别是根据随机分组和健康素养水平,对偏好舒适治疗的患者比例的差异。
76 名患者被随机分为口头(n=43)或视频(n=33)组。在接受高级痴呆症口头描述和治疗目标的患者中,31 名(72%)患者选择舒适治疗;5 名(12%)选择有限治疗;7 名(16%)选择延长生命的治疗。在视频组中,30 名(91%)患者选择舒适治疗;3 名(9%)选择有限治疗;没有人选择延长生命的治疗(χ²=6.3,df=2,p=0.047)。与选择舒适治疗的可能性更大相关的因素包括更高的健康素养(未经调整的优势比[OR]12.1;95%置信区间[CI],2.4-62.6)和随机分配到视频组(未经调整的 OR 3.9;95% CI,1.0-15.1)。
与健康素养较低的患者相比,健康素养较高的农村患者更有可能选择舒适的治疗。此外,与仅听取口头描述的患者相比,观看视频决策辅助工具的患者更有可能选择舒适治疗。这些发现表明,视频可以帮助患者表达自己的偏好,并且需要设计能够考虑健康素养的干预措施来帮助这些患者。