Suppr超能文献

性选择。

Sexual selection.

机构信息

Centre for Ecology & Conservation, Biosciences, The University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Tremough, Penryn TR10 9EZ, Cornwall, UK.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2011 Jan 25;21(2):R62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053.

Abstract

Sexual selection is a concept that has probably been misunderstood and misrepresented more than any other idea in evolutionary biology, confusion that continues to the present day. We are not entirely sure why this is, but sexual politics seems to have played its role, as does a failure to understand what sexual selection is and why it was initially invoked. While in some ways less intuitive than natural selection, sexual selection is conceptually identical to it, and evolution via either mechanism will occur given sufficient genetic variation. Recent claims that sexual selection theory is fundamentally flawed are simply wrong and ignore an enormous body of evidence that provides a bedrock of support for this major mechanism of organic evolution. In fact it is partly due to this solid foundation that current research has largely shifted from documenting whether or not sexual selection occurs, to addressing more complex evolutionary questions.

摘要

性选择是进化生物学中最容易被误解和歪曲的概念之一,这种混淆一直持续到今天。我们不完全确定为什么会这样,但性政治似乎起了作用,对性选择的本质和最初被援引的原因缺乏理解也是原因之一。虽然在某些方面不如自然选择直观,但性选择在概念上与自然选择是相同的,只要有足够的遗传变异,通过这两种机制的进化都会发生。最近有人声称性选择理论从根本上有缺陷,这种说法完全是错误的,它忽视了大量的证据,这些证据为这一主要的有机进化机制提供了坚实的基础。事实上,正是由于这一坚实的基础,当前的研究在很大程度上已经从记录性选择是否发生,转移到解决更复杂的进化问题上来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验