Suppr超能文献

在接受应激-静息心肌灌注闪烁显像的患者中,缺血和瘢痕对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗的疗效的影响。

Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

机构信息

Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr;32(8):1012-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq500. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

Abstract

AIMS

Although pre-revascularization ischaemia testing is recommended, the interaction between the extent of ischaemia and myocardial scar with performance of revascularization on patient survival is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 13 969 patients who underwent adenosine or exercise stress SPECT myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). The percent myocardium ischaemic (%I) and fixed (%F) were calculated using 5 point/20-segment MPS scoring. Patients lost to follow-up (2.8%) were excluded leaving 13 555 patients [35% with history (Hx) of known coronary artery disease (CAD), 65% exercise stress, 61% male, age 66 ± 12]. Follow-up was performed at 12-18 months for early revascularization and at >7 years for all-cause death (ACD) (mean follow-up 8.7 ± 3.3 years). All-cause death was modelled using Cox proportional hazards modelling adjusting for logistic-based propensity scores, MPS, revascularization, and baseline characteristics. During FU, 3893 ACD (29%, 3.3%/year) and 1226 early revascularizations (9.0%) occurred. After risk-adjustment, a three-way interaction was present between %I, early revascularization, and HxCAD, such that %I identified a survival benefit with early revascularization in patients without prior myocardial infarction (MI), whereas no such benefit was present in patients with prior MI (overall model χ(2)= 3932, P < 0.001; interaction P < 0.021). Further modelling revealed that after excluding patients with scar >10% total myocardium, %I identified a survival benefit in all patients.

CONCLUSION

In this large observational series with long-term follow-up, patients with significant ischaemia and without extensive scar were likely to realize a survival benefit from early revascularization. In contrast, the survival of patients with minimal ischaemia was superior with medical therapy without early revascularization.

摘要

目的

尽管推荐进行血管重建术前缺血检测,但缺血程度和心肌瘢痕与血管重建术对患者生存的影响之间的相互作用尚不清楚。

方法和结果

我们纳入了 13969 例接受腺苷或运动负荷 SPECT 心肌灌注闪烁显像(MPS)的患者。采用 5 分/20 节段 MPS 评分法计算缺血心肌百分比(%I)和固定性缺血(%F)。排除失访(2.8%)患者后,共纳入 13555 例患者[35%有已知冠心病(CAD)病史(Hx),65%行运动负荷试验,61%为男性,年龄 66±12 岁]。早期血管重建术的随访时间为 12-18 个月,全因死亡(ACD)的随访时间为>7 年(平均随访 8.7±3.3 年)。使用 Cox 比例风险模型对全因死亡进行建模,模型中校正了基于逻辑的倾向评分、MPS、血管重建术和基线特征。在随访期间,发生了 3893 例 ACD(29%,3.3%/年)和 1226 例早期血管重建术(9.0%)。在风险调整后,%I、早期血管重建术和 HxCAD 之间存在三向交互作用,即对于无既往心肌梗死(MI)的患者,%I 可通过早期血管重建术带来生存获益,而对于有既往 MI 的患者则无此获益(整体模型 χ(2)=3932,P<0.001;交互作用 P<0.021)。进一步建模显示,排除心肌瘢痕>10%的患者后,%I 可使所有患者的生存获益。

结论

在这项具有长期随访的大型观察性系列研究中,存在严重缺血但无广泛瘢痕的患者可能会从早期血管重建术获得生存获益。相比之下,缺血程度轻微的患者接受药物治疗而不进行早期血管重建术的生存结局更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验