Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Int Orthop. 2011 Aug;35(8):1237-43. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1204-4. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
Reduction and intramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures is often challenging. Osteosynthesis frequently fails and a higher rate of non-unions is found. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of an additional cerclage to anatomically reduce and support the medial hinge. The application is based on the experience of the surgeon; as yet no biomechanical data are available.
Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora were used to determine the biomechanical and clinical advantage of an additional cerclage. All femora were tested in a materials testing system after osteotomy, osteosynthesis with the Gamma III nail and randomisation into two groups with or without additional cerclage.
After cyclic loading the compressive load to reach plastic deformation of 5 mm was 2,160 N on average in the group without cerclage vs 2,330 N on average in the group with cerclage. This biomechanical advantage showed no statistical significance (p = 0.2). Radiological examination when the abort criterion was reached revealed that use of the additional wire cerclage could significantly decrease the failure of osteosynthesis (100 vs 10%) after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures (p < 0.05).
In view of the more invasive operative approach with additional soft tissue injuries, application of an additional cerclage should still be considered carefully. Nevertheless, a mini-open approach to difficult fractures could be helpful in reducing the fracture with a clamp and is sometimes essential. The damage to the soft tissue must be weighed against the benefits of the procedure. An additional cerclage in oblique subtrochanteric fractures is a good option to ensure the reposition and cortical medial support if appropriate and to decrease osteosynthesis failure and rates of non-unions.
转子下骨折的复位和髓内固定常常具有挑战性。骨愈合常常失败,且发现更高的不愈合率。本研究旨在评估附加环形钢丝对解剖复位和支撑内侧铰链的益处。该应用基于外科医生的经验;目前尚无生物力学数据。
使用十对人尸体股骨来确定附加环形钢丝的生物力学和临床优势。所有股骨均在截骨后、使用伽马 III 钉进行接骨术以及随机分为两组(附加环形钢丝或不附加环形钢丝)后在材料测试系统中进行测试。
在循环加载下,达到 5mm 塑性变形的压缩负荷平均为无环形钢丝组 2160N,而有环形钢丝组为 2330N。该生物力学优势无统计学意义(p=0.2)。当达到中止标准时的放射学检查显示,在使用髓内钉固定转子下骨折时,附加钢丝环形钢丝的使用可以显著降低接骨术失败(100% vs 10%)(p<0.05)。
考虑到附加的软组织损伤的更具侵袭性的手术方法,应谨慎考虑应用附加环形钢丝。然而,对于困难骨折的微创入路可能有助于通过夹具减少骨折,并在某些情况下是必要的。必须权衡软组织损伤与手术益处。对于斜形转子下骨折,附加环形钢丝是确保重新定位和皮质内侧支撑的好方法,如果合适,可降低接骨术失败率和不愈合率。