Hoskins Wayne, Bingham Roger, Joseph Sam, Liew Danny, Love David, Bucknill Andrew, Oppy Andrew, Griffin Xavier
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Injury. 2015 Oct;46(10):1992-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
Subtrochanteric neck of femur fractures are a challenge to treat due to anatomical and biomechanical factors. Poor reduction, varus deformity, nonunion and return to theatre risks are high. A cerclage wire can augment an intramedullary nail to help fracture reduction and construct stability. Concerns exist regarding the use of cerclage wire on fracture zone vascularity. The aim of this study was to assess the benefits and adverse outcomes associated with the use of cerclage wiring.
A 7-year retrospective review of all subtrochanteric fractures at a Level 1 trauma centre was performed. Pathological fractures, those associated with bisphosphonate use and segmental fractures were excluded. A clinical and radiographic review was performed. Our primary outcome measure was a composite of the major complications of this surgery, defined as either return to theatre for fixation failure, nonunion or implant failure. Fracture displacement, angulation and quality of reduction were measured as secondary outcome measures. Specific complications of the use of cerclage wiring were also reported.
One hundred and thirty four cases met the inclusion criteria for primary outcome. Reduction was achieved closed in 51.9% (n=70), open in 33.3% (n=45) and open with cerclage wire in 14.8% (n=20). Overall there were a total of 13 (9.7%) major complications. No cases with cerclage wire had a return to theatre. If cerclage wire was not used the major complication rate was 11.4%. Fracture displacement (11.0mm vs. 7.69mm) and distraction were related to return to theatre (p<0.05). Cerclage wire use improved fracture displacement (3.2mm vs. 8.8mm), angulation and quality of reduction (p<0.05).
Anatomical reduction is the key to success of subtrochanteric fractures. Cerclage wire use results in better fracture reduction. Some subtrochanteric fractures can be successfully treated with indirect reduction alone. If fractures cannot be reduced closed, reduction should be achieved by open methods. If a fracture is opened, a cerclage wire should be used, if the fracture pattern allows.
由于解剖学和生物力学因素,股骨转子下骨折的治疗具有挑战性。复位不佳、内翻畸形、骨不连和再次手术风险较高。环扎钢丝可增强髓内钉的作用,有助于骨折复位并构建稳定性。对于在骨折区域使用环扎钢丝对血管的影响存在担忧。本研究的目的是评估使用环扎钢丝的益处和不良后果。
对一家一级创伤中心所有转子下骨折进行了为期7年的回顾性研究。排除病理性骨折、与使用双膦酸盐相关的骨折和节段性骨折。进行了临床和影像学评估。我们的主要结局指标是该手术的主要并发症的综合指标,定义为因内固定失败、骨不连或植入物失败而再次手术。骨折移位、成角和复位质量作为次要结局指标进行测量。还报告了使用环扎钢丝的特定并发症。
134例符合主要结局的纳入标准。51.9%(n = 70)通过闭合复位成功,33.3%(n = 45)通过切开复位成功,14.8%(n = 20)通过切开复位并使用环扎钢丝成功。总体共有13例(9.7%)主要并发症。使用环扎钢丝的病例中无一例再次手术。如果不使用环扎钢丝,主要并发症发生率为11.4%。骨折移位(11.0mm对7.69mm)和分离与再次手术相关(p<0.05)。使用环扎钢丝可改善骨折移位(3.2mm对8.8mm)、成角和复位质量(p<0.05)。
解剖复位是转子下骨折成功的关键。使用环扎钢丝可实现更好的骨折复位。一些转子下骨折仅通过间接复位即可成功治疗。如果骨折无法闭合复位,则应通过切开方法实现复位。如果骨折切开,在骨折类型允许的情况下应使用环扎钢丝。