Granec Darija, Ivković Alan, Belina Stanko, Pavlović Rajko
Specijalna bolnica za medicinsku rehabilitaciju Krapinske Toplice
Lijec Vjesn. 2010 Sep-Oct;132(9-10):293-7.
The aim of this study was to present the distribution and representation of shoulder ultrasonographic (US) examination findings in patients with diagnosis of humeroscapular periarthritis. US examination findings in 141 patients, that is 147 symptomatic shoulders with diagnosis of humeroscapular periarthritis, were evaluated retrospectively. Outcomes of ultrasonography were distributed in groups by anatomical location, US examination finding and age. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Out of 147 analyzed shoulders, 87 (59.2%) were positive and 60 (40.8%) were negative upon US examination. The most frequent US abnormalities were detected in a supraspinatus tendon (55.3%), followed by long head of the biceps tendon (15.2%), bursitis (12.6%), subscapularis tendinitis (10.6%) and infraspinatus tendinitis (0.7%). The highest number of US abnormalities, as well as negative ultrasonographies, were detected at the age 40 to 65. The least negative US examination findings were at age over 65, where also the highest number of supraspinatus tears were detected. Due to high specificity and sensitivity in the evaluation of the rotator cuff, subacromial bursa and long head of the biceps tendon changes, ultrasound is a reliable method for evaluation of patients with painful shoulder. Its availability, noninvasivity and relatively low cost make it a method of choice for inital evaluation of such patients. Detailed history and clinical examination are going to lessen inadequate medical requests for ultrasonography.
本研究的目的是呈现诊断为肩周炎的患者肩部超声(US)检查结果的分布及表现。对141例患者(即147个诊断为肩周炎的有症状肩部)的US检查结果进行回顾性评估。超声检查结果按解剖位置、US检查结果及年龄分组。采用描述性统计分析数据。在147个分析的肩部中,超声检查时87个(59.2%)为阳性,60个(40.8%)为阴性。最常见的超声异常出现在冈上肌腱(55.3%),其次是肱二头肌长头(15.2%)、滑囊炎(12.6%)、肩胛下肌腱炎(10.6%)和冈下肌腱炎(0.7%)。超声异常数量最多以及超声检查为阴性的情况出现在40至65岁。超声检查阴性结果最少的是65岁以上人群,该年龄段还检测到最多的冈上肌撕裂。由于超声在评估肩袖、肩峰下囊及肱二头肌长头肌腱变化方面具有高特异性和敏感性,因此是评估肩部疼痛患者的可靠方法。其可用性、无创性及相对较低的成本使其成为此类患者初始评估的首选方法。详细的病史和临床检查将减少对超声检查不必要的医疗需求。