• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[新药:退款保证?]

[New drugs: money-back guarantee?].

作者信息

Steenhoek Adri, Koopmanschap Marc A, Franken Margreet G, Rutten Frans F H

机构信息

Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Instituut Beleid & Management Gezondheidszorg, Sectie Gezondheidseconomie, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A2042.

PMID:21262015
Abstract

When a new medical technology, for example a new drug, is introduced onto the market there should be a discussion of the balance between "uncertainty versus value to society and demand". The new technology is sometimes given the benefit of the doubt due to a lack of information. Follow-up investigation is actually essential but is seldom mandatory and hardly ever spontaneously initiated. Specific measures, based on stimulation or penalization, could reduce the degree of uncertainty concerning the efficacy, safety and efficiency of a new technology. A serious option when a new drug produces disappointing results is to pay the manufacturer less.

摘要

当一种新的医疗技术,例如一种新药,投放市场时,应该对“不确定性与对社会的价值和需求”之间的平衡进行讨论。由于缺乏信息,新技术有时会被给予疑罪从无的待遇。后续调查实际上至关重要,但很少是强制性的,而且几乎从未自发开展过。基于激励或惩罚的具体措施,可以降低新技术在疗效、安全性和效率方面的不确定性程度。当一种新药产生令人失望的结果时,一个严肃的选择是减少向制造商付款。

相似文献

1
[New drugs: money-back guarantee?].[新药:退款保证?]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A2042.
2
Can't get no satisfaction? Will pay for performance help?: toward an economic framework for understanding performance-based risk-sharing agreements for innovative medical products.无法获得满足感?付费绩效能否有所帮助?:理解创新型医疗产品基于绩效的风险分担协议的经济框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(2):93-102. doi: 10.2165/11314080-000000000-00000.
3
Risk-sharing agreements for innovative drugs: a new solution to old problems?创新药物的风险分担协议:旧问题的新解决方案?
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;7(3):155-7. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0386-6.
4
[Clinical researchers and pharmaceutical industry. Dangerous liaisons].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Aug 7;143(32):1668-71.
5
[Innovative agreements with the pharmaceutical industry: "pay for performance"].与制药行业的创新协议:“按绩效付费”
Farm Hosp. 2010 Mar-Apr;34(2):53-5. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
6
[Evaluation of the medical value of a drug. A necessity for the Transparency Commission].[药物医学价值评估。透明度委员会的必要性]
Therapie. 1992 Jan-Feb;47(1):9-16.
7
Risk-sharing arrangements that link payment for drugs to health outcomes are proving hard to implement.事实证明,将药品支付与健康结果挂钩的风险分担安排很难实施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2329-37. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1147.
8
Issues in bringing new drugs to the market.将新药推向市场所面临的问题。
Science. 2005 Dec 2;310(5753):1425-6; author reply 1425-6.
9
Analysis of a pharmaceutical risk sharing agreement based on the purchaser's total budget.基于购买方总预算的药品风险分担协议分析
Health Econ. 2005 Aug;14(8):793-803. doi: 10.1002/hec.976.
10
[A model for structured introduction of new drugs. The aim is to offer all patients appropriate treatment].[一种新药结构化引入的模型。目的是为所有患者提供适当的治疗]
Lakartidningen. 2008;105(42):2917-22.